MExMI: Pool-based Active Model Extraction Crossover Membership Inference
Yaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Huadi Zheng, Chengfang Fang, Jie Shi
Abstract
With increasing popularity of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS), ML models trained from public and proprietary data are deployed in the cloud and deliver prediction services to users. However, as the prediction API becomes a new attack surface, growing concerns have arisen on the confidentiality of ML models. Existing literatures show their vulnerability under model extraction (ME) attacks, while their private training data is vulnerable to another type of attacks, namely, membership inference (MI). In this paper, we show that ME and MI can reinforce each other through a chained and iterative reaction, which can significantly boost ME attack accuracy and improve MI by saving the query cost. As such, we build a framework MExMI for pool-based active model extraction (PAME) to exploit MI through three modules: “MI Pre-Filter”, “MI Post-Filter”, and “semi-supervised boosting”. Experimental results show that MExMI can improve up to 11 . 14% from the best known PAME attack and reach 94 . 07% fidelity with only 16k queries. Furthermore, the accuracy, precision and recall of the MI attack in MExMI are on par with state-of-the-art MI attack which needs 150k queries.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f2f313fa-d7e0-4bd6-92be-3185184c2c44Cited by top-tier papers7
- Reminiscence Attack on Residuals: Exploiting Approximate Machine Unlearning for PrivacyYaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Li Hu, Huadi Zheng et al.ICCV 2025 · 6 citations
- MER-Inspector: Assessing Model Extraction Risks from An Attack-Agnostic PerspectiveXinwei Zhang, Haibo Hu, Qingqing Ye, Li Bai et al.WWW 2025 · 5 citations
- "Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced DistillationZi Liang, Qingqing Ye, Yanyun Wang, Sen Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 2 citations
- Stochastic Universal Adversarial Perturbations with Fixed Optimization Constraint and Ensured High-probability TransferabilityYulin Jin, Xiaoyu Zhang, Haoyu Tong, Jian Lou et al.AAAI 2026
- Class-feature Watermark: A Resilient Black-box Watermark Against Model Extraction AttacksYaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye, Zi Liang, Haoyang Li et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on14
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Variational Adversarial Active LearningSamarth Sinha, Sayna Ebrahimi, Trevor DarrellICCV 2019 · 662 citations
Related papers
- Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model ExtractionVarun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha et al.USENIX Security 2020
- Cascading and Proxy Membership Inference AttacksYuntao Du, Jiacheng Li, Yuetian Chen, Kaiyuan Zhang et al.NDSS 2026 · 8 citations
- ActiveThief: Model Extraction Using Active Learning and Unannotated Public DataSoham Pal, Yash Gupta, Aditya Shukla, Aditya Kanade et al.AAAI 2020 · 164 citations
- MI: Multi-modal Models Membership InferencePingyi Hu, Zihan Wang, Ruoxi Sun, Hu Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- Extracting Robust Models with Uncertain ExamplesGuanlin Li, Guowen Xu, Shangwei Guo, Han Qiu et al.ICLR 2023
