EMNLP Findings2024
Inference-Time Decontamination: Reusing Leaked Benchmarks for Large Language Model Evaluation
Qin Zhu, Qinyuan Cheng, Runyu Peng, Xiaonan Li, Ru Peng, Tengxiao Liu, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang
Abstract
The training process of large language models (LLMs) often involves varying degrees of test data contamination (Yang et al., 2023b). Although current LLMs are achieving increasingly better performance on various benchmarks, their performance in practical applications does not always match their benchmark results. Leakage of benchmarks can prevent the accurate assessment of LLMs' true performance. However, constructing new benchmarks is costly, labor-intensive and still carries the risk of leakage. Therefore, in this paper, we ask the question "Can we reuse these leaked benchmarks for LLM evaluation?" We propose Inference-Time Decontamination (ITD) to address this issue by detecting and rewriting leaked samples without altering their difficulties. ITD can mitigate performance inflation caused by memorizing leaked benchmarks. Our proof-of-concept experiments demonstrate that ITD reduces inflated accuracy by 22.9% on GSM8K and 19.0% on MMLU. On MMLU, using Inference-time Decontamination can lead to a decrease in the results of Phi3 and Mistral by 6.7% and 3.6% respectively. We hope that ITD can provide more truthful evaluation results for large language models.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 6 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- From Assistant to Independent Developer — Are GPTs Ready for Software Development?Dezhi Ran, Yuan Cao, Mengzhou Wu, Simin Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- LiveClin: A Live Clinical Benchmark without LeakageXidong Wang, Guo shuqi, Yue Shen, Junying Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- When Benchmarks Leak: Inference-Time Decontamination for LLMsJianzhe Chai, Zhe Yu, Jun SakumaACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Benchmarking Large Language Models Under Data Contamination: A Survey from Static to Dynamic EvaluationSimin Chen, Yiming Chen, Zexin Li, Yifan Jiang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- DyCodeEval: Dynamic Benchmarking of Reasoning Capabilities in Code Large Language Models Under Data ContaminationSimin Chen, Pranav Pusarla, Baishakhi RayICML 2025
Builds on8
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained ModelAohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 295 citations
- Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language ModelsShahriar Golchin, Mihai SurdeanuICLR 2024 · 165 citations
Related papers
- An Open-Source Data Contamination Report for Large Language ModelsYucheng Li, Yunhao Guo, Frank Guerin, Chenghua LinEMNLP Findings 2024 · 19 citations
- LNE-Blocking: An Efficient Framework for Contamination Mitigation Evaluation on Large Language ModelsRuijie Hou, Jiao Yueyang, Hanxu Hu, Yingming Li et al.EMNLP Findings 2025
- ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language ModelsJasper Dekoninck, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2024 · 40 citations
- NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each BenchmarkOscar Sainz, Jon Ander Campos, Iker García-Ferrero, Julen Etxaniz et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 85 citations
- Overestimation in LLM Evaluation: A Controlled Large-Scale Study on Data Contamination's Impact on Machine TranslationMuhammed Yusuf Kocyigit, Eleftheria Briakou, Daniel Deutsch, Jiaming Luo et al.ICML 2025
