Distribution-Level Feature Distancing for Machine Unlearning: Towards a Better Trade-off Between Model Utility and Forgetting
Dasol Choi, Dongbin Na
Abstract
With the explosive growth of deep learning applications and increasing privacy concerns, the right to be forgotten has become a critical requirement in various AI industries. For example, given a facial recognition system, some individuals may wish to remove their personal data that might have been used in the training phase. Unfortunately, deep neural networks sometimes unexpectedly leak personal identities, making this removal challenging. While recent machine unlearning algorithms aim to enable models to forget specific data, we identify an unintended utility drop—correlation collapse—in which the essential correlations between image features and true labels weaken during the forgetting process. To address this challenge, we propose Distribution-Level Feature Distancing (DLFD), a novel method that efficiently forgets instances while preserving task-relevant feature correlations. Our method synthesizes data samples by optimizing the feature distribution to be distinctly different from that of forget samples, achieving effective results within a single training epoch. Through extensive experiments on facial recognition datasets, we demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art machine unlearning methods in both forgetting performance and model utility preservation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Easy to Learn, Yet Hard to Forget: Towards Robust Unlearning Under BiasJuneHyoung Kwon, MiHyeon Kim, Eunju Lee, Yoonji Lee et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- A Unified Framework for Diffusion Model Unlearning with f-DivergenceNicola Novello, Federico Fontana, Luigi Cinque, Deniz Gunduz et al.ICML 2026
- Factor Decorrelation Enhanced Data Removal from Deep Predictive ModelsWenhao Yang, Lin Li, Xiaohui Tao, Kaize ShiNeurIPS 2025
Builds on12
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine UnlearningJinghan Jia, Jiancheng Liu, Parikshit Ram, Yuguang Yao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 293 citations
- Adaptive Machine UnlearningVarun Gupta, Christopher Jung, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 262 citations
Related papers
- Boundary Unlearning: Rapid Forgetting of Deep Networks via Shifting the Decision BoundaryMin Chen, Weizhuo Gao, Gaoyang Liu, Kai Peng et al.CVPR 2023
- Prototype Surgery: Tailoring Neural Prototypes via Soft Labels for Efficient Machine UnlearningGaoyang Liu, Xijie Wang, Zixiong Wang, Chen Wang et al.CCS 2025
- Amnesiac Machine LearningLaura Graves, Vineel Nagisetty, Vijay GaneshAAAI 2021 · 416 citations
- Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine UnlearningHongsheng Hu, Shuo Wang, Tian Dong, Minhui XueS&P 2024 · 62 citations
- The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid RetrainingYi Liu, Lei Xu, Xingliang Yuan, Cong Wang et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 189 citations
