Characterizing Visualization Perception with Psychological Phenomena: Uncovering the Role of Subitizing in Data Visualization
Arran Zeyu Wang, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Mengyuan Zhu, Chin Tseng, Danielle Albers Szafir
Abstract
Understanding how people perceive visualizations is crucial for designing effective visual data representations; however, many heuristic design guidelines are derived from specific tasks or visualization types, without considering the constraints or conditions under which those guidelines hold. In this work, we aimed to assess existing design heuristics for categorical visualization using well-established psychological knowledge. Specifically, we examine the impact of the subitizing phenomenon in cognitive psychology-people's ability to automatically recognize a small set of objects instantly without counting-in data visualizations. We conducted three experiments with multi-class scatterplots-between 2 and 15 classes with varying design choices-across three different tasks-class estimation, correlation comparison, and clustering judgments-to understand how performance changes as the number of classes (and therefore set size) increases. Our results indicate if the category number is smaller than six, people tend to perform well at all tasks, providing empirical evidence of subitizing in visualization. When category numbers increased, performance fell, with the magnitude of the performance change depending on task and encoding. Our study bridges the gap between heuristic guidelines and empirical evidence by applying well-established psychological theories, suggesting future opportunities for using psychological theories and constructs to characterize visualization perception.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f1c2f90e-d9b9-4d19-b378-c95b030a97cfCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Evaluation of Sampling Methods for ScatterplotsJun Yuan, Shouxing Xiang, Jiazhi Xia, Lingyun Yu et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 50 citations
- A Design Space of Vision Science Methods for Visualization ResearchMadison A. Elliott, Christine Nothelfer, Cindy Xiong, Danielle Albers SzafirIEEE VIS 2020 · 48 citations
- Do You See What I See? A Qualitative Study Eliciting High-Level Visualization ComprehensionGhulam Jilani Quadri, Arran Zeyu Wang, Zhehao Wang, Jennifer Adorno Nieves et al.CHI 2024 · 37 citations
- The Weighted Average Illusion: Biases in Perceived Mean Position in ScatterplotsMatt-Heun Hong, Jessica K. Witt, Danielle Albers SzafirIEEE VIS 2021 · 30 citations
- : A Cluster Ambiguity Measure for Estimating Perceptual Variability in Visual ClusteringHyeon Jeon, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Hyunwook Lee, Paul Rosen et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Shape It Up: An Empirically Grounded Approach for Designing Shape PalettesChin Tseng, Arran Zeyu Wang, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Danielle Albers SzafirIEEE VIS 2024 · 6 citations
- Measuring Categorical Perception in Color-Coded ScatterplotsChin Tseng, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Zeyu Wang, Danielle Albers SzafirCHI 2023 · 20 citations
- Modeling the Influence of Visual Density on Cluster Perception in Scatterplots Using TopologyGhulam Jilani Quadri, Paul RosenIEEE VIS 2020 · 24 citations
- Professional Differences: A Comparative Study of Visualization Task Performance and Spatial Ability Across DisciplinesKyle Wm. Hall, Anthony Kouroupis, Anastasia Bezerianos, Danielle Albers Szafir et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 23 citations
- Uncovering How Scatterplot Features Skew Visual Class SeparationS. Sandra Bae, Takanori Fujiwara, Chin Tseng, Danielle Albers SzafirCHI 2025 · 3 citations
