Stability and Generalization of Adversarial Training for Shallow Neural Networks with Smooth Activation
Kaibo Zhang, Yunjuan Wang, Raman Arora
Abstract
Adversarial training has emerged as a popular approach for training models that are robust to inference-time adversarial attacks. However, our theoretical understanding of why and when it works remains limited. Prior work has offered generalization analysis of adversarial training, but they are either restricted to the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) regime or they make restrictive assumptions about data such as (noisy) linear separability or robust realizability. In this work, we study the stability and generalization of adversarial training for two-layer networks without any data distribution assumptions and beyond the NTK regime. Our findings suggest that for networks with any given initialization and sufficiently large width, the generalization bound can be effectively controlled via early stopping. We further improve the generalization bound by leveraging smoothing using Moreau's envelope.
T ) due to non-smoothness. Lei and Ying [2020] tackled the non-smoothness differently by assuming the gradient of the loss to be Hölder continuous. For non-convex and non-smooth loss, Lei [2023] introduced the stability of sub-gradient, as convergence to local minimizers is observed in this setting.
The standard method of giving a generalization guarantee is through uniform convergence. These theories typically yield an upper bound of O( 1 √ n ) and require a large number of training samples in order to get a small generalization gap. Techniques in this category include analyzing the Rademacher complexity [
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f17e5bc4-f85d-4b23-aec2-d1e18bd309e7Cited by top-tier papers3
- Towards Resilient Safety-driven Unlearning for Diffusion Models against Downstream Fine-tuningBoheng Li, Renjie Gu, Junjie Wang, Leyi Qi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Generalization Error Analysis for Selective State-Space Models Through the Lens of AttentionArya Honarpisheh, Mustafa Bozdag, Octavia I. Camps, Mario SznaierNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- On the Interaction of Compressibility and Adversarial RobustnessMelih Barsbey, Antônio H. Ribeiro, Umut Simsekli, Tolga BirdalICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on22
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Bag of Tricks for Adversarial TrainingTianyu Pang, Xiao Yang, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su et al.ICLR 2021 · 298 citations
- Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networksZiwei Ji, Matus TelgarskyICLR 2020 · 193 citations
- Fine-Grained Analysis of Stability and Generalization for Stochastic Gradient DescentYunwen Lei, Yiming YingICML 2020 · 165 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training from Mean Field PerspectiveSoichiro Kumano, Hiroshi Kera, Toshihiko YamasakiNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- Benign Overfitting in Adversarial Training of Neural NetworksYunjuan Wang, Kaibo Zhang, Raman AroraICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Stability Analysis and Generalization Bounds of Adversarial TrainingJiancong Xiao, Yanbo Fan, Ruoyu Sun, Jue Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
- Uniformly Stable Algorithms for Adversarial Training and BeyondJiancong Xiao, Jiawei Zhang, Zhi-Quan Luo, Asuman E. OzdaglarICML 2024 · 2 citations
- On the Algorithmic Stability of Adversarial TrainingYue Xing, Qifan Song, Guang ChengNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
