Disentangling Transfer in Continual Reinforcement Learning
Maciej Wolczyk, Michal Zajac, Razvan Pascanu, Lukasz Kucinski, Piotr Milos
Abstract
The ability of continual learning systems to transfer knowledge from previously seen tasks in order to maximize performance on new tasks is a significant challenge for the field, limiting the applicability of continual learning solutions to realistic scenarios. Consequently, this study aims to broaden our understanding of transfer and its driving forces in the specific case of continual reinforcement learning. We adopt SAC as the underlying RL algorithm and Continual World as a suite of continuous control tasks. We systematically study how different components of SAC (the actor and the critic, exploration, and data) affect transfer efficacy, and we provide recommendations regarding various modeling options. The best set of choices, dubbed ClonEx-SAC, is evaluated on the recent Continual World benchmark. ClonEx-SAC achieves 87% final success rate compared to 80% of PackNet, the best method in the benchmark. Moreover, the transfer grows from 0.18 to 0.54 according to the metric provided by Continual World.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f16ece4d-b2a9-47ff-a992-5c9478905bc3Cited by top-tier papers12
- Learning to Modulate pre-trained Models in RLThomas Schmied, Markus Hofmarcher, Fabian Paischer, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Fine-tuning Reinforcement Learning Models is Secretly a Forgetting Mitigation ProblemMaciej Wolczyk, Bartlomiej Cupial, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Michal Bortkiewicz et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- CaDeT: A Causal Disentanglement Approach for Robust Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous DrivingMozhgan Pourkeshavarz, Junrui Zhang, Amir RasouliCVPR 2024 · 15 citations
- Continual Task Allocation in Meta-Policy Network via Sparse PromptingYijun Yang, Tianyi Zhou, Jing Jiang, Guodong Long et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Self-Composing Policies for Scalable Continual Reinforcement LearningMikel Malagón, Josu Ceberio, José Antonio LozanoICML 2024 · 13 citations
Builds on8
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task LearningTianhe Yu, Saurabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey Levine et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,261 citations
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLAniruddh Raghu, Maithra Raghu, Samy Bengio, Oriol VinyalsICLR 2020 · 736 citations
- What is being transferred in transfer learning?Behnam Neyshabur, Hanie Sedghi, Chiyuan ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 654 citations
Related papers
- Continual World: A Robotic Benchmark For Continual Reinforcement LearningMaciej Wolczyk, Michal Zajac, Razvan Pascanu, Lukasz Kucinski et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 152 citations
- Building a Subspace of Policies for Scalable Continual LearningJean-Baptiste Gaya, Thang Doan, Lucas Caccia, Laure Soulier et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Prevalence of Negative Transfer in Continual Reinforcement Learning: Analyses and a Simple BaselineHongjoon Ahn, Jinu Hyeon, Youngmin Oh, Bosun Hwang et al.ICLR 2025
- Efficient Continual Learning with Modular Networks and Task-Driven PriorsTom Veniat, Ludovic Denoyer, Marc'Aurelio RanzatoICLR 2021 · 110 citations
- A Probabilistic Framework for Modular Continual LearningLazar Valkov, Akash Srivastava, Swarat Chaudhuri, Charles SuttonICLR 2024 · 5 citations
