Flexible Group Count Enables Hassle-Free Structured Pruning
Jiamu Zhang, Shaochen Zhong, Andrew Ye, Zirui Liu, Sebastian Zhao, Kaixiong Zhou, Li Li, Soo-Hyun Choi, Rui Chen, Xia Hu, Shuai Xu, Vipin Chaudhary
Abstract
Densely structured pruning methods -which generate pruned models in a fully dense format, allowing immediate compression benefits without additional demands -are evolving due to their practical significance. Traditional techniques in this domain mainly revolve around coarser granularities, such as filter pruning, thereby limiting performance due to restricted pruning freedom. Recent advancements in Grouped Kernel Pruning (GKP) have enabled the utilization of finer granularities while maintaining a densely structured format. We observe that existing GKP methods often introduce dynamic operations to different aspects of their procedures at the cost of adding complications and/or imposing limitations (e.g., requiring an expensive mixture of clustering schemes), or contain dynamic pruning rates and sizes among groups that result in a reliance on custom architecture support for its pruned models. In this work, we argue that the best practice to introduce these dynamic operations to GKP is to make Conv2d(groups) (a.k.a. group count) flexible under an integral optimization, leveraging its ideal alignment with the infrastructure support of Grouped Convolution. Pursuing such a direction, we present a one-shot, post-train, data-agnostic GKP method that is more performant, adaptive, and efficient than its predecessors while simultaneously being user-friendly, with little-to-no hyper-parameter tuning or handcrafting of criteria required.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef63ee25-d65c-410c-95a6-e6f73016fe2fBuilds on21
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
- CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image CaptioningJack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras et al.EMNLP 2021 · 937 citations
- Learning N: M Fine-grained Structured Sparse Neural Networks From ScratchAojun Zhou, Yukun Ma, Junnan Zhu, Jianbo Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 301 citations
- Pruning from ScratchYulong Wang, Xiaolu Zhang, Lingxi Xie, Jun Zhou et al.AAAI 2020 · 219 citations
- SCOP: Scientific Control for Reliable Neural Network PruningYehui Tang, Yunhe Wang, Yixing Xu, Dacheng Tao et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 208 citations
Related papers
- Revisit Kernel Pruning with Lottery Regulated Grouped ConvolutionsShaochen (Henry) Zhong, Guanqun Zhang, Ningjia Huang, Shuai XuICLR 2022 · 36 citations
- One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel PruningShaochen (Henry) Zhong, Zaichuan You, Jiamu Zhang, Sebastian Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- Dynamic Structure Pruning for Compressing CNNsJun-Hyung Park, Yeachan Kim, Junho Kim, Joon-Young Choi et al.AAAI 2023 · 24 citations
- Pruning Filter in FilterFanxu Meng, Hao Cheng, Ke Li, Huixiang Luo et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 130 citations
- REPrune: Channel Pruning via Kernel Representative SelectionMincheol Park, Dongjin Kim, Cheonjun Park, Yuna Park et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
