Revisit Kernel Pruning with Lottery Regulated Grouped Convolutions
Shaochen (Henry) Zhong, Guanqun Zhang, Ningjia Huang, Shuai Xu
Abstract
Structured pruning methods which are capable of delivering a densely pruned network are among the most popular techniques in the realm of neural network pruning, where most methods prune the original network at a filter or layer level. Although such methods may provide immediate compression and acceleration benefits, we argue that the blanket removal of an entire filter or layer may result in undesired accuracy loss. In this paper, we revisit the idea of kernel pruning (to only prune one or several kernels out of a 3D-filter), a heavily overlooked approach under the context of structured pruning. This is because kernel pruning will naturally introduce sparsity to filters within the same convolutional layer — thus, making the remaining network no longer dense. We address this problem by proposing a versatile grouped pruning framework where we first cluster filters from each convolutional layer into equal-sized groups, prune the grouped kernels we deem unimportant from each filter group, then permute the remaining filters to form a densely grouped convolutional architecture (which also enables the parallel computing capability) for fine-tuning. Specifically, we consult empirical findings from a series of literature regarding to determine the optimal clustering scheme per layer, and develop a simple yet cost-efficient greedy approximation algorithm to determine which group kernels to keep within each filter group. Extensive experiments also demonstrate our method often outperforms comparable SOTA methods with lesser data augmentation needed, smaller fine-tuning budget required, and sometimes even much simpler procedure executed (e.g., one-shot v. iterative). Please refer to our GitHub repository (https://github.com/choH/lottery_regulated_grouped_kernel_pruning) for code.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b36e4734-5e2e-4e96-9666-3d71bf427178Cited by top-tier papers8
- RSC: Accelerate Graph Neural Networks Training via Randomized Sparse ComputationsZirui Liu, Shengyuan Chen, Kaixiong Zhou, Daochen Zha et al.ICML 2023 · 24 citations
- Dynamic Structure Pruning for Compressing CNNsJun-Hyung Park, Yeachan Kim, Junho Kim, Joon-Young Choi et al.AAAI 2023 · 24 citations
- Winner-Take-All Column Row Sampling for Memory Efficient Adaptation of Language ModelZirui Liu, Guanchu Wang, Shaochen Zhong, Zhaozhuo Xu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel PruningShaochen (Henry) Zhong, Zaichuan You, Jiamu Zhang, Sebastian Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- REPrune: Channel Pruning via Kernel Representative SelectionMincheol Park, Dongjin Kim, Cheonjun Park, Yuna Park et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Flexible Group Count Enables Hassle-Free Structured PruningJiamu Zhang, Shaochen Zhong, Andrew Ye, Zirui Liu et al.CVPR 2025
- Coarsening the Granularity: Towards Structurally Sparse Lottery TicketsTianlong Chen, Xuxi Chen, Xiaolong Ma, Yanzhi Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 42 citations
- RT3D: Achieving Real-Time Execution of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks on Mobile DevicesWei Niu, Mengshu Sun, Zhengang Li, Jou-An Chen et al.AAAI 2021 · 14 citations
- Pruning Filter in FilterFanxu Meng, Hao Cheng, Ke Li, Huixiang Luo et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 130 citations
- Convolutional Neural Network Pruning With Structural Redundancy ReductionZi Wang, Chengcheng Li, Xiangyang WangCVPR 2021
