Anonymous, Robust Post-quantum Public Key Encryption
Paul Grubbs, Varun Maram, Kenneth G. Paterson
Abstract
A core goal of the NIST PQC competition is to produce public-key encryption (PKE) schemes which, even if attacked with a large-scale quantum computer, maintain the security guarantees needed by applications. The main security focus in the NIST PQC context has been IND-CCA security, but other applications demand that PKE schemes provide anonymity (Bellare et al., ASIACRYPT 2001), and robustness (Abdalla et al., TCC 2010). Examples of such applications include anonymous communications systems, cryptocurrencies, anonymous credential systems, searchable encryption, and auction protocols. Almost nothing is known about how to build post-quantum PKE schemes offering these security properties. In particular, the status of the NIST PQC finalists with respect to anonymity and robustness is unknown. This paper offers a systematic study of anonymity and robustness for post-quantum PKE schemes. We focus on two theoretical aspects. Firstly, we study the crucial role of implicit/explicit rejection for the KEM used in the standard KEM-DEM paradigm and how it affects anonymity and robustness of the resulting PKE scheme. Secondly, we examine how the Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transforms (Fujisaki and Okamtoto, Journal of Cryptology 2013) confer robustness and enhance weak anonymity of a base PKE scheme to strong anonymity for the resulting KEM. We then leverage our theoretical results to study the anonymity and robustness of the four NIST finalists: Classic McEliece, Kyber, NTRU and Saber. We exhibit a striking property of the PKE scheme obtained from the Classic McEliece KEM using the standard KEM-DEM construction: for any message m, we can construct a single hybrid ciphertext c which decrypts to the chosen m under any Classic McEliece private key. This highlights that Classic McEliece does not lead to a robust PKE scheme and presents a barrier to using our proof techniques to establish the anonymity of Classic McEliece. As a side-result of our treatment, we identify (and repair) technical gaps in the IND-CCA security claims for Saber; we also provide positive anonymity and robustness results for Saber. Similarly, we identify issues with the IND-CCA security claims for Kyber; these also act as a barrier to proving its anonymity. Finally, we describe technical barriers to applying our techniques to NTRU. Our work, as well as being of theoretical interest, directly contributes to the broad-spectrum evaluation of NIST candidate algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef1c6f5a-8c69-4335-a0d8-2f25e2408478Cited by top-tier papers4
- A Logic and an Interactive Prover for the Computational Post-Quantum Security of ProtocolsCas Cremers, Caroline Fontaine, Charlie JacommeS&P 2022 · 19 citations
- Formally Verifying Kyber - Episode V: Machine-Checked IND-CCA Security and Correctness of ML-KEM in EasyCryptJosé Bacelar Almeida, Santiago Arranz-Olmos, Manuel Barbosa, Gilles Barthe et al.CRYPTO 2024 · 16 citations
- Obfuscated Key ExchangeFelix Günther, Douglas Stebila, Shannon VeitchCCS 2024 · 1 citation
- The SecureDrop Protocol: End-to-End Encrypted Whistleblowing for AllGiulio Berra, Felix Linker, Luca Maier, Cory Francis Myers et al.CCS 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Anonymity of NIST PQC Round 3 KEMsKeita XagawaEUROCRYPT 2022 · 21 citations
- Faster Lattice-Based KEMs via a Generic Fujisaki-Okamoto Transform Using Prefix HashingJulien Duman, Kathrin Hövelmanns, Eike Kiltz, Vadim Lyubashevsky et al.CCS 2021 · 1 citation
- Formal Verification of Saber's Public-Key Encryption Scheme in EasyCryptAndreas Hülsing, Matthias Meijers, Pierre-Yves StrubCRYPTO 2022 · 11 citations
- Tighter QCCA-Secure Key Encapsulation Mechanism with Explicit Rejection in the Quantum Random Oracle ModelJiangxia Ge, Tianshu Shan, Rui XueCRYPTO 2023 · 8 citations
- Post-Quantum Multi-Recipient Public Key EncryptionJoël Alwen, Dominik Hartmann, Eike Kiltz, Marta Mularczyk et al.CCS 2023 · 6 citations
