Tighter QCCA-Secure Key Encapsulation Mechanism with Explicit Rejection in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
Jiangxia Ge, Tianshu Shan, Rui Xue
Abstract
Hofheinz et al. (TCC 2017) proposed several key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) variants of Fujisaki-Okamoto (FO) transformation, including , , , , and , and they are widely used in the post-quantum cryptography standardization launched by NIST. These transformations are divided into two types, the implicit and explicit rejection type, including and , respectively. The decapsulation algorithm of the implicit (resp. explicit) rejection type returns a pseudorandom value (resp. an abort symbol ) for an invalid ciphertext.
For the implicit rejection type, the IND-CCA security reduction of in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) can avoid the quadratic security loss, as shown by Kuchta et al. (EUROCRYPT 2020). However, for the explicit rejection type, the best known IND-CCA security reduction in the QROM presented by Hövelmanns et al. (ASIACRYPT 2022) for still suffers from a quadratic security loss. Moreover, it is not clear until now whether the implicit rejection type is more secure than the explicit rejection type.
In this paper, a QROM security reduction of without incurring a quadratic security loss is provided. Furthermore, our reduction achieves IND-qCCA security, which is stronger than the IND-CCA security. To achieve our result, two steps are taken: The first step is to prove that the IND-qCCA security of can be tightly reduced to the IND-CPA security of by using the online extraction technique proposed by Don et al. (EUROCRYPT 2022). The second step is to prove that the IND-CPA security of can be reduced to the IND-CPA security of the underlying public key encryption (PKE) scheme without incurring quadratic security loss by using the Measure-Rewind-Measure One-Way to Hiding Lemma (EUROCRYPT 2020).
In addition, we prove that (at least from a theoretic point of view), security is independent of whether the rejection type is explicit () or implicit () if the underlying PKE scheme is weakly -spread.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 98045bee-dd24-4bc4-89e0-45f6d2a5150eRelated papers
- (Un)breakable Curses - Re-encryption in the Fujisaki-Okamoto TransformKathrin Hövelmanns, Andreas Hülsing, Christian Majenz, Fabrizio SisinniEUROCRYPT 2025 · 4 citations
- A Key-Recovery Timing Attack on Post-quantum Primitives Using the Fujisaki-Okamoto Transformation and Its Application on FrodoKEMQian Guo, Thomas Johansson, Alexander NilssonCRYPTO 2020 · 84 citations
- Verifiable Decapsulation: Recognizing Faulty Implementations of Post-quantum KEMsLewis Glabush, Felix Günther, Kathrin Hövelmanns, Douglas StebilaCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- Measure-Rewind-Measure: Tighter Quantum Random Oracle Model Proofs for One-Way to Hiding and CCA SecurityVeronika Kuchta, Amin Sakzad, Damien Stehlé, Ron Steinfeld et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 60 citations
- Post-quantum TLS 1.3 Handshake from CPA-Secure KEMs with Tighter ReductionsJinrong Chen, Biming Zhou, Rongmao Chen, Haodong Jiang et al.EUROCRYPT 2026
