Understanding fraudulence in online qualitative studies: From the researcher's perspective
Aswati Panicker, Novia Nurain, Zaidat Ibrahim, Chun-Han Ariel Wang, Seung Wan Ha, Yuxing Wu, Kay Connelly, Katie A. Siek, Chia-Fang Chung
Abstract
Researchers are increasingly facilitating qualitative research studies online. While this has made research more accessible for participation, there have been notable encounters with “fraudulent” participants. By fraudulent, we refer to individuals who are deceptive about meeting the inclusion criteria, their identity, or experiences. Fraudulent participants have generated new challenges for researchers who have to interact 1:1 with these individuals, face ethical dilemmas on appropriate next steps, diagnose and prevent the issue from happening again, and deal with their own identity as a scholar. In this study, we interview 16 HCI researchers to understand and learn from their experiences. We contribute: (1) an understanding of how HCI qualitative researchers deal with fraudulent participants; (2) a guide for qualitative HCI researchers on how to handle fraudulence; and (3) a reflection on how the HCI research community might better improve our science and training efforts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef0629e6-85bf-4935-86d4-bbce45373543Cited by top-tier papers9
- Customizing Emotional Support: How Do Individuals Construct and Interact With LLM-Powered ChatbotsXi Zheng, Zhuoyang Li, Xinning Gui, Yuhan LuoCHI 2025 · 47 citations
- Privacy Perceptions of Custom GPTs by Users and CreatorsRongjun Ma, Caterina Maidhof, Juan Carlos Carrillo, Janne Lindqvist et al.CHI 2025 · 35 citations
- Engagements with Generative AI and Personal Health Informatics: Opportunities for Planning, Tracking, Reflecting, and Acting around Personal Health DataShaan Chopra, Katherine Juarez, James Fogarty, Sean A. MunsonUbiComp 2025 · 11 citations
- Mental Health Impacts of AI Companions: Triangulating Social Media Quasi-Experiments, User Perspectives, and Relational LensYunhao Yuan, Jiaxun Zhang, Talayeh Aledavood, Renwen Zhang et al.CHI 2026 · 8 citations
- The TaPSI Research Framework - A Systematization of Knowledge on Tangible Privacy and Security InterfacesSarah Delgado Rodriguez, Maximiliane Windl, Florian Alt, Karola MarkyCHI 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on6
- Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping ReviewRobert Bowman, Camille Nadal, Kellie Morrissey, Anja Thieme et al.CHI 2023 · 106 citations
- Are Deepfakes Concerning? Analyzing Conversations of Deepfakes on Reddit and Exploring Societal ImplicationsDilrukshi Gamage, Piyush Ghasiya, Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Mark E. Whiting et al.CHI 2022 · 77 citations
- Standardizing Reporting of Participant Compensation in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for the FieldJessica Pater, Amanda Coupe, Rachel Pfafman, Chanda Phelan et al.CHI 2021 · 52 citations
- Beyond Bot Detection: Combating Fraudulent Online Survey Takers✱Ziyi Zhang, Shuofei Zhu, Jaron Mink, Aiping Xiong et al.WWW 2022 · 51 citations
- Using HCI in Cross-Disciplinary Teams: A Case Study of Academic Collaboration in HCI-Health Teams in the US Using a Team Science PerspectiveElena Agapie, Shefali Haldar, Sharmaine Galvez PobleteCSCW 2022 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
- Who Are You Asking?: Qualitative Methods for Involving AAC Users as Primary Research ParticipantsErin BeneteauCHI 2020 · 28 citations
- Why, when, and from whom: considerations for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data in HCIYiqun T. Chen, Angela D. R. Smith, Katharina Reinecke, Alexandra ToCHI 2023 · 20 citations
- Do you really code? Designing and Evaluating Screening Questions for Online Surveys with ProgrammersAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Stefan Horstmann, Matthew SmithICSE 2021 · 5 citations
- How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to ResearchSena Çerçi, Marta E. Cecchinato, John VinesCHI 2021 · 30 citations
