Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling Accuracy
Dongmin Park, Seola Choi, Doyoung Kim, Hwanjun Song, Jae-Gil Lee
Abstract
Data pruning, which aims to downsize a large training set into a small informative subset, is crucial for reducing the enormous computational costs of modern deep learning. Though large-scale data collections invariably contain annotation noise and numerous robust learning methods have been developed, data pruning for the noise-robust learning scenario has received little attention. With state-of-the-art Re-labeling methods that self-correct erroneous labels while training, it is challenging to identify which subset induces the most accurate re-labeling of erroneous labels in the entire training set. In this paper, we formalize the problem of data pruning with re-labeling. We first show that the likelihood of a training example being correctly re-labeled is proportional to the prediction confidence of its neighborhood in the subset. Therefore, we propose a novel data pruning algorithm, Prune4Rel, that finds a subset maximizing the total neighborhood confidence of all training examples, thereby maximizing the re-labeling accuracy and generalization performance. Extensive experiments on four real and one synthetic noisy datasets show that outperforms the baselines with Re-labeling models by up to 9.1% as well as those with a standard model by up to 21.6%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee7d0dfc-ad3e-4503-ae6e-a012554497e2Cited by top-tier papers12
- Refined Coreset Selection: Towards Minimal Coreset Size under Model Performance ConstraintsXiaobo Xia, Jiale Liu, Shaokun Zhang, Qingyun Wu et al.ICML 2024 · 17 citations
- CLIPCleaner: Cleaning Noisy Labels with CLIPChen Feng, Georgios Tzimiropoulos, Ioannis PatrasACM MM 2024 · 12 citations
- Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset PruningXin Zhang, Jiawei Du, Yunsong Li, Weiying Xie et al.CVPR 2024 · 12 citations
- Human and AI Perceptual Differences in Image Classification ErrorsMinghao Liu, Jiaheng Wei, Yang Liu, James DavisAAAI 2025 · 11 citations
- GDeR: Safeguarding Efficiency, Balancing, and Robustness via Prototypical Graph PruningGuibin Zhang, Haonan Dong, Yuchen Zhang, Zhixun Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on26
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
- Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency TrainingQizhe Xie, Zihang Dai, Eduard H. Hovy, Thang Luong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,774 citations
Related papers
- Sample-wise Label Confidence Incorporation for Learning with Noisy LabelsChanho Ahn, Kikyung Kim, Ji-Won Baek, Jongin Lim et al.ICCV 2023 · 11 citations
- Self-Paced Robust Learning for Leveraging Clean Labels in Noisy DataXuchao Zhang, Xian Wu, Fanglan Chen, Liang Zhao et al.AAAI 2020 · 22 citations
- DRoP: Distributionally Robust Data PruningArtem M. Vysogorets, Kartik Ahuja, Julia KempeICLR 2025
- Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization InfluenceShuo Yang, Zeke Xie, Hanyu Peng, Min Xu et al.ICLR 2023 · 21 citations
- Distilling the Knowledge in Data PruningEmanuel Ben Baruch, Adam Botach, Igor Kviatkovsky, Manoj Aggarwal et al.ICML 2025
