GDeR: Safeguarding Efficiency, Balancing, and Robustness via Prototypical Graph Pruning
Guibin Zhang, Haonan Dong, Yuchen Zhang, Zhixun Li, Dingshuo Chen, Kai Wang, Tianlong Chen, Yuxuan Liang, Dawei Cheng, Kun Wang
Abstract
Training high-quality deep models necessitates vast amounts of data, resulting in overwhelming computational and memory demands. Recently, data pruning, distillation, and coreset selection have been developed to streamline data volume by retaining, synthesizing, or selecting a small yet informative subset from the full set. Among these methods, data pruning incurs the least additional training cost and offers the most practical acceleration benefits. However, it is the most vulnerable, often suffering significant performance degradation with imbalanced or biased data schema, thus raising concerns about its accuracy and reliability in on-device deployment. Therefore, there is a looming need for a new data pruning paradigm that maintains the efficiency of previous practices while ensuring balance and robustness. Unlike the fields of computer vision and natural language processing, where mature solutions have been developed to address these issues, graph neural networks (GNNs) continue to struggle with increasingly large-scale, imbalanced, and noisy datasets, lacking a unified dataset pruning solution. To achieve this, we introduce a novel dynamic soft-pruning method, GDeR, designed to update the training ``basket'' during the process using trainable prototypes. GDeR first constructs a well-modeled graph embedding hypersphere and then samples representative, balanced, and unbiased subsets from this embedding space, which achieves the goal we called Graph Training Debugging. Extensive experiments on five datasets across three GNN backbones, demonstrate that GDeR (I) achieves or surpasses the performance of the full dataset with 30% 50% fewer training samples, (II) attains up to a 2.81x lossless training speedup, and (III) outperforms state-of-the-art pruning methods in imbalanced training and noisy training scenarios by 0.3% 4.3% and 3.6% 7.8%, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 10e18562-2ce2-4f6e-b8a9-bf2d61e24407Cited by top-tier papers4
- IceBerg: Debiased Self-Training for Class-Imbalanced Node ClassificationZhixun Li, Dingshuo Chen, Tong Zhao, Daixin Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- SA²GFM: Enhancing Robust Graph Foundation Models with Structure-Aware Semantic AugmentationJunhua Shi, Qingyun Sun, Haonan Yuan, Xingcheng FuAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Learning Dynamics of Logits Debiasing for Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised LearningYue Cheng, Jiajun Zhang, Xiaohui Gao, Weiwei Xing et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Bridging the Gap Between Cross-Domain Theory and Practical Application: A Case Study on Molecular DissolutionSihan Wang, Wenjie Du, Qing Zhu, Yang WangNeurIPS 2025
Builds on52
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the HypersphereTongzhou Wang, Phillip IsolaICML 2020 · 2,360 citations
Related papers
- When Sparsity Meets Contrastive Models: Less Graph Data Can Bring Better Class-Balanced RepresentationsChunhui Zhang, Chao Huang, Yijun Tian, Qianlong Wen et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
- Repeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of LearningPatrik Okanovic, Roger Waleffe, Vasilis Mageirakos, Konstantinos E. Nikolakakis et al.ICLR 2024 · 29 citations
- D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity & Difficulty in Data PruningAdyasha Maharana, Prateek Yadav, Mohit BansalICLR 2024 · 19 citations
- Two Heads Are Better Than One: Boosting Graph Sparse Training via Semantic and Topological AwarenessGuibin Zhang, Yanwei Yue, Kun Wang, Junfeng Fang et al.ICML 2024 · 15 citations
- PruneGNN: Algorithm-Architecture Pruning Framework for Graph Neural Network AccelerationDeniz Gurevin, Mohsin Shan, Shaoyi Huang, Md Amit Hasan et al.HPCA 2024 · 28 citations
