CWF: Consolidating Weak Features in High-quality Mesh Simplification
Rui Xu, Longdu Liu, Ningna Wang, Shuang-Min Chen, Shiqing Xin, Xiaohu Guo, Zichun Zhong, Taku Komura, Wenping Wang, Changhe Tu
Abstract
In mesh simplification, common requirements like accuracy, triangle quality, and feature alignment are often considered as a trade-off. Existing algorithms concentrate on just one or a few specific aspects of these requirements. For example, the well-known Quadric Error Metrics (QEM) approach [Garland and Heckbert 1997] prioritizes accuracy and can preserve strong feature lines/points as well, but falls short in ensuring high triangle quality and may degrade weak features that are not as distinctive as strong ones. In this paper, we propose a smooth functional that simultaneously considers all of these requirements. The functional comprises a normal anisotropy term and a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) [Du et al. 1999] energy term, with the variables being a set of movable points lying on the surface. The former inherits the spirit of QEM but operates in a continuous setting, while the latter encourages even point distribution, allowing various surface metrics. We further introduce a decaying weight to automatically balance the two terms. We selected 100 CAD models from the ABC dataset [Koch et al. 2019], along with 21 organic models, to compare the existing mesh simplification algorithms with ours. Experimental results reveal an important observation: the introduction of a decaying weight effectively reduces the conflict between the two terms and enables the alignment of weak features. This distinctive feature sets our approach apart from most existing mesh simplification methods and demonstrates significant potential in shape understanding. Please refer to the teaser figure for illustration.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee6dbc78-8dcb-42a8-900e-4ad3737a4535Cited by top-tier papers6
- MeshMosaic: Scaling Artist Mesh Generation via Local-to-Global AssemblyRui Xu, Tianyang Xue, Qiujie Dong, Le Wan et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
- Dual Contouring of Signed Distance DataXiana Carrera, Ningna Wang, Christopher Batty, Oded Stein et al.SIGGRAPH 2026 · 1 citation
- PDT: Point Distribution Transformation with Diffusion ModelsJionghao Wang, Cheng Lin, Yuan Liu, Rui Xu et al.SIGGRAPH 2025
- TetSphere Splatting: Representing High-Quality Geometry with Lagrangian Volumetric MeshesMinghao Guo, Bohan Wang, Kaiming He, Wojciech MatusikICLR 2025
- Feature-Preserving Mesh Decimation for Normal IntegrationMoritz Heep, Sven Behnke, Eduard ZellCVPR 2025
Builds on3
- Robust Low-Poly Meshing for General 3D ModelsZhen Chen, Zherong Pan, Kui Wu, Etienne Vouga et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 32 citations
- Surface Simplification using Intrinsic Error MetricsHsueh-Ti Derek Liu, Mark Gillespie, Benjamin Chislett, Nicholas Sharp et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 26 citations
- Variational Shape Reconstruction via Quadric Error MetricsTong Zhao, Laurent Busé, David Cohen-Steiner, Tamy Boubekeur et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Structural MAT: Clean and Scalable Medial Axis Simplification via Explicit Surface CorrespondencePengfei Wang, Shuangmin Chen, Dong-Ming Yan, Ying He et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
- Single Edge Collapse Quad-Dominant Mesh ReductionJulian KnodtSIGGRAPH 2025 · 2 citations
- Field Smoothness-Controlled Partition for QuadrangulationZhongxuan Liang, Wei Du, Xiao-Ming FuSIGGRAPH 2025 · 2 citations
- Reliable feature-line driven quad-remeshingNico Pietroni, Stefano Nuvoli, Thomas Alderighi, Paolo Cignoni et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 64 citations
- Global Discrete Optimization for Quad-Dominant Mesh ReductionYuzhe Luo, Jingchen Gao, Zherong Pan, Kui Wu et al.SIGGRAPH 2026
