Sample-Adaptivity Tradeoff in On-Demand Sampling
Nika Haghtalab, Omar Montasser, Mingda Qiao
Abstract
We study the tradeoff between sample complexity and round complexity in on-demand sampling, where the learning algorithm adaptively samples from distributions over a limited number of rounds. In the realizable setting of Multi-Distribution Learning (MDL), we show that the optimal sample complexity of an -round algorithm scales approximately as . For the general agnostic case, we present an algorithm that achieves near-optimal sample complexity of within rounds. Of independent interest, we introduce a new framework, Optimization via On-Demand Sampling (OODS), which abstracts the sample-adaptivity tradeoff and captures most existing MDL algorithms. We establish nearly tight bounds on the round complexity in the OODS setting. The upper bounds directly yield the -round algorithm for agnostic MDL, while the lower bounds imply that achieving sub-polynomial round complexity would require fundamentally new techniques that bypass the inherent hardness of OODS.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee2d44a9-7134-4c6b-9a05-b74b83785524Builds on6
- Distributionally Robust Neural NetworksShiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Percy LiangICLR 2020 · 1,578 citations
- On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple DistributionsNika Haghtalab, Michael I. Jordan, Eric ZhaoNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Multi-group Agnostic PAC LearnabilityGuy N. Rothblum, Gal YonaICML 2021 · 48 citations
- Simple and near-optimal algorithms for hidden stratification and multi-group learningChristopher J. Tosh, Daniel HsuICML 2022 · 28 citations
- Memory Bounds for Continual LearningXi Chen, Christos H. Papadimitriou, Binghui PengFOCS 2022 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Agnostic Active Learning Is Always Better Than Passive LearningSteve HannekeNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Revisiting Agnostic BoostingArthur da Cunha, Mikael Møller Høgsgaard, Andrea Paudice, Yuxin SunNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Adaptive Data Collection for Robust Learning Across Multiple DistributionsChengbo Zang, Mehmet Kerem Türkcan, Gil Zussman, Zoran Kostic et al.ICML 2025
- Statistically Near-Optimal Hypothesis SelectionOlivier Bousquet, Mark Braverman, Gillat Kol, Klim Efremenko et al.FOCS 2021
- Agnostic Multi-Group Active LearningNicholas Rittler, Kamalika ChaudhuriNeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
