Statistical-Computational Trade-offs for Density Estimation
Anders Aamand, Alexandr Andoni, Justin Y. Chen, Piotr Indyk, Shyam Narayanan, Sandeep Silwal, Haike Xu
Abstract
We study the density estimation problem defined as follows: given k distributions p 1 , . . . , p k over a discrete domain [n], as well as a collection of samples chosen from a "query" distribution q over [n], output p i that is "close" to q. Recently [1] gave the first and only known result that achieves sublinear bounds in both the sampling complexity and the query time while preserving polynomial data structure space. However, their improvement over linear samples and time is only by subpolynomial factors. Our main result is a lower bound showing that, for a broad class of data structures, their bounds cannot be significantly improved. In particular, if an algorithm uses O(n/ log c k) samples for some constant c > 0 and polynomial space, then the query time of the data structure must be at least k 1-O(1)/ log log k , i.e., close to linear in the number of distributions k. This is a novel statistical-computational trade-off for density estimation, demonstrating that any data structure must use close to a linear number of samples or take close to linear query time. The lower bound holds even in the realizable case where q = p i for some i, and when the distributions are flat (specifically, all distributions are uniform over half of the domain [n]). We also give a simple data structure for our lower bound instance with asymptotically matching upper bounds. Experiments show that the data structure is quite efficient in practice. * Work done as a student at MIT 2 In this paper we focus on finite domains. 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0064fa0-3e70-46c2-897f-b794f6c6a65dCited by top-tier papers2
- Query-Efficient Locally Private Hypothesis Selection via the Scheffe GraphGautam Kamath, Alireza F. Pour, Matthew Regehr, David P. WoodruffNeurIPS 2025
- Nearly-Linear Time Private Hypothesis Selection with the Optimal Approximation FactorMaryam Aliakbarpour, Zhan Shi, Ria Stevens, Vincent X. WangNeurIPS 2025
Builds on3
- Hypothesis Selection with Memory ConstraintsMaryam Aliakbarpour, Mark Bun, Adam SmithNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Data Structures for Density EstimationAnders Aamand, Alexandr Andoni, Justin Y. Chen, Piotr Indyk et al.ICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Subsets and Supermajorities: Optimal Hashing-based Set Similarity SearchThomas D. Ahle, Jakob Bæk Tejs KnudsenFOCS 2020 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Kernel Density Estimation through Density Constrained Near Neighbor SearchMoses Charikar, Michael Kapralov, Navid Nouri, Paris SiminelakisFOCS 2020 · 9 citations
- A Quasi-Monte Carlo Data Structure for Smooth Kernel EvaluationsMoses Charikar, Michael Kapralov, Erik WaingartenSODA 2024 · 2 citations
- Statistically Near-Optimal Hypothesis SelectionOlivier Bousquet, Mark Braverman, Gillat Kol, Klim Efremenko et al.FOCS 2021
- Tight Lower Bounds for Central String Queries in Compressed SpaceDominik Kempa, Tomasz KociumakaSODA 2026
- Optimal Hypothesis Selection in (Almost) Linear TimeMaryam Aliakbarpour, Mark Bun, Adam SmithNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
