Provable Robustness against Wasserstein Distribution Shifts via Input Randomization
Aounon Kumar, Alexander Levine, Tom Goldstein, Soheil Feizi
Abstract
Certified robustness in machine learning has primarily focused on adversarial perturbations with a fixed attack budget for each sample in the input distribution. In this work, we present provable robustness guarantees on the accuracy of a model under bounded Wasserstein shifts of the data distribution. We show that a simple procedure that randomizes the input of the model within a transformation space is provably robust to distributional shifts under that transformation. Our framework allows the datum-specific perturbation size to vary across different points in the input distribution and is general enough to include fixed-sized perturbations as well. Our certificates produce guaranteed lower bounds on the performance of the model for any shift (natural or adversarial) of the input distribution within a Wasserstein ball around the original distribution. We apply our technique to certify robustness against natural (non-adversarial) transformations of images such as color shifts, hue shifts, and changes in brightness and saturation. We obtain strong performance guarantees for the robust model under clearly visible shifts in the input images. Our experiments establish the non-vacuousness of our certificates by showing that the certified lower bound on a robust model's accuracy is higher than the empirical accuracy of an undefended model under a distribution shift. We also show provable distributional robustness against adversarial attacks. Moreover, our results also imply guaranteed lower bounds (hardness result) on the performance of models trained on so-called "unlearnable" datasets that have been poisoned to interfere with model training. We show that the performance of a robust model is guaranteed to remain above a certain threshold on the test distribution even when the base model is trained on the poisoned dataset.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Certified Robustness against Sensor Heterogeneity in Acoustic SensingPhuc Duc Nguyen, Yimin Dai, Xiaoli Li, Rui TanUbiComp 2025 · 1 citation
- Provably Unlearnable Data ExamplesDerui Wang, Minhui Xue, Bo Li, Seyit Camtepe et al.NDSS 2025
Builds on15
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image ClassificationRohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- Adversarial Self-Supervised Contrastive LearningMinseon Kim, Jihoon Tack, Sung Ju HwangNeurIPS 2020 · 294 citations
- Unlearnable Examples: Making Personal Data UnexploitableHanxun Huang, Xingjun Ma, Sarah Monazam Erfani, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2021 · 255 citations
Related papers
- How Robust Are Randomized Smoothing Based Defenses to Data Poisoning?Akshay Mehra, Bhavya Kailkhura, Pin-Yu Chen, Jihun HammCVPR 2021
- On Robustness of Linear Classifiers to Targeted Data PoisoningNakshatra Gupta, Sumanth Prabhu S, Supratik Chakraborty, R. VenkateshAAAI 2026
- CC-CERT: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural NetworksMikhail Pautov, Nurislam Tursynbek, Marina Munkhoeva, Nikita Muravev et al.AAAI 2022 · 27 citations
- Encoding Robustness to Image Style via Adversarial Feature PerturbationsManli Shu, Zuxuan Wu, Micah Goldblum, Tom GoldsteinNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- TSS: Transformation-Specific Smoothing for Robustness CertificationLinyi Li, Maurice Weber, Xiaojun Xu, Luka Rimanic et al.CCS 2021 · 21 citations
