Freely Given Consent?: Studying Consent Notice of Third-Party Tracking and Its Violations of GDPR in Android Apps
Trung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ben Stock
Abstract
Adopted in May 2018, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires the consent for processing users' personal data to be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous. While prior work has shown that this often is not given through automated network traffic analysis, no research has systematically studied how consent notices are currently implemented and whether they conform to GDPR in mobile apps. To close this research gap, we perform the first large-scale study into consent notices for third-party tracking in Android apps to understand the current practices and the current state of GDPR's consent violations. Specifically, we propose a mostly automated and scalable approach to identify the currently implemented consent notices and apply it to a set of 239,381 Android apps. As a result, we recognize four widely implemented mechanisms to interact with the consent user interfaces from 13,082 apps. We then develop a tool that automatically detects users' personal data sent out to the Internet with different consent conditions based on the identified mechanisms. Doing so, we find 30,160 apps do not even attempt to implement consent notices for sharing users' personal data with third-party data controllers, which mandate explicit consent under GDPR. In contrast, out of 13,082 apps implemented consent notices, we identify 2,688 (20.54%) apps violate at least one of the GDPR consent requirements, such as trying to deceive users into accepting all data sharing or even continuously transmitting data when users have explicitly opted out. To allow developers to address the problems, we send emails to notify affected developers and gather insights from their responses. Our study shows the urgent need for more transparent processing of personal data and supporting developers in this endeavor to comply with legislation, ensuring users can make free and informed choices regarding their data. CCS CONCEPTS • General and reference → Measurement; • Security and privacy → Privacy protections; Usability in security and privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ed001f7e-53de-4cb1-b17f-bd2e0ea3ffa1Cited by top-tier papers24
- Unveiling the Tricks: Automated Detection of Dark Patterns in Mobile ApplicationsJieshan Chen, Jiamou Sun, Sidong Feng, Zhenchang Xing et al.UIST 2023 · 42 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Abandon All Hope Ye Who Enter Here: A Dynamic, Longitudinal Investigation of Android's Data Safety SectionIoannis Arkalakis, Michalis Diamantaris, Serafeim Moustakas, Sotiris Ioannidis et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 13 citations
- 50 Shades of Deceptive Patterns: A Unified Taxonomy, Multimodal Detection, and Security ImplicationsZewei Shi, Ruoxi Sun, Jieshan Chen, Jiamou Sun et al.WWW 2025 · 12 citations
- SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy RegulationsEleanor Birrell, Jay Rodolitz, Angel Ding, Jenna Lee et al.S&P 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on14
- Stack Overflow Considered Harmful? The Impact of Copy&Paste on Android Application SecurityFelix Fischer, Konstantin Böttinger, Huang Xiao, Christian Stransky et al.S&P 2017 · 293 citations
- Apps, Trackers, Privacy, and Regulators: A Global Study of the Mobile Tracking EcosystemAbbas Razaghpanah, Rishab Nithyanand, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, Srikanth Sundaresan et al.NDSS 2018 · 271 citations
- Automated Analysis of Privacy Requirements for Mobile AppsSebastian Zimmeck, Ziqi Wang, Lieyong Zou, Roger Iyengar et al.NDSS 2017 · 255 citations
- Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice? : Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent FrameworkCélestin Matte, Nataliia Bielova, Cristiana Teixeira SantosS&P 2020 · 212 citations
- Hey, You Have a Problem: On the Feasibility of Large-Scale Web Vulnerability NotificationBen Stock, Giancarlo Pellegrino, Christian Rossow, Martin Johns et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 130 citations
Related papers
- Share First, Ask Later (or Never?) Studying Violations of GDPR's Explicit Consent in Android AppsTrung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ninja Marnau, Ben StockUSENIX Security 2021 · 70 citations
- The OK Is Not Enough: A Large Scale Study of Consent Dialogs in Smartphone ApplicationsSimon Koch, Benjamin Altpeter, Martin JohnsUSENIX Security 2023
- PolicyChecker: Analyzing the GDPR Completeness of Mobile Apps' Privacy PoliciesAnhao Xiang, Weiping Pei, Chuan YueCCS 2023 · 24 citations
- Automated Large-Scale Analysis of Cookie Notice ComplianceAhmed Bouhoula, Karel Kubicek, Amit Zac, Carlos Cotrini et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 25 citations
- Are We Getting Well-informed? An In-depth Study of Runtime Privacy Notice Practice in Mobile AppsShuai Li, Zhemin Yang, Yuhong Nan, Shutian Yu et al.CCS 2024 · 1 citation
