USENIX Security2016Top-tier venue
Hey, You Have a Problem: On the Feasibility of Large-Scale Web Vulnerability Notification
Ben Stock, Giancarlo Pellegrino, Christian Rossow, Martin Johns, Michael Backes
Abstract
Large-scale discovery of thousands of vulnerable Web sites has become a frequent event, thanks to recent advances in security research and the rise in maturity of Internet-wide scanning tools. The issues related to disclosing the vulnerability information to the affected parties, however, have only been treated as a side note in prior research. In this paper, we systematically examine the feasibility and efficacy of large-scale notification campaigns. For this, we comprehensively survey existing communication channels and evaluate their usability in an automated notification process. Using a data set of over 44,000 vulnerable Web sites, we measure success rates, both with respect to the total number of fixed vulnerabilities and to reaching responsible parties, with the following highlevel results: Although our campaign had a statistically significant impact compared to a control group, the increase in the fix rate of notified domains is marginal. If a notification report is read by the owner of the vulnerable application, the likelihood of a subsequent resolution of the issues is sufficiently high: about 40%. But, out of 35,832 transmitted vulnerability reports, only 2,064 (5.8%) were actually received successfully, resulting in an unsatisfactory overall fix rate, leaving 74.5% of Web applications exploitable after our month-long experiment. Thus, we conclude that currently no reliable notification channels exist, which significantly inhibits the success and impact of large-scale notification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3e6fd2e-330a-4f98-a022-a9e55d50ac9dCited by top-tier papers31
- Network Hygiene, Incentives, and Regulation: Deployment of Source Address Validation in the InternetMatthew J. Luckie, Robert Beverly, Ryan Koga, Ken Keys et al.CCS 2019 · 89 citations
- Didn't You Hear Me? - Towards More Successful Web Vulnerability NotificationsBen Stock, Giancarlo Pellegrino, Frank Li, Michael Backes et al.NDSS 2018 · 86 citations
- Don't Trust The Locals: Investigating the Prevalence of Persistent Client-Side Cross-Site Scripting in the WildMarius Steffens, Christian Rossow, Martin Johns, Ben StockNDSS 2019 · 84 citations
- Cleaning Up the Internet of Evil Things: Real-World Evidence on ISP and Consumer Efforts to Remove MiraiOrçun Çetin, Carlos Gañán, Lisette Altena, Takahiro Kasama et al.NDSS 2019 · 57 citations
- The Cookie Hunter: Automated Black-box Auditing for Web Authentication and Authorization FlawsKostas Drakonakis, Sotiris Ioannidis, Jason PolakisCCS 2020 · 56 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Effective Notification Campaigns on the Web: A Matter of Trust, Framing, and SupportMax Maass, Alina Stöver, Henning Pridöhl, Sebastian Bretthauer et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 35 citations
- Behind the Curtain: How Shared Hosting Providers Respond to Vulnerability NotificationsGiada Stivala, Rafael Mrowczynski, Maria Hellenthal, Giancarlo PellegrinoS&P 2026
- Do They Get With the Program? Measuring Mitigation in a Solicited Vulnerability Notification ProgramYana Angelova, Carlos Gañán, Annebel Smit, Rolf van Wegberg et al.USENIX Security 2026
- The Unpatchables: Why Municipalities Persist in Running Vulnerable HostsAksel Ethembabaoglu, Rolf van Wegberg, Yury Zhauniarovich, Michel van EetenUSENIX Security 2024 · 4 citations
- The (Un)usual Suspects - Studying Reasons for Lacking Updates in WordPressMaria Hellenthal, Lena Gotsche, Rafael Mrowczynski, Sarah Kugel et al.NDSS 2025
