USENIX Security2024Top-tier venue
Loopy Hell(ow): Infinite Traffic Loops at the Application Layer
Yepeng Pan, Anna Ascheman, Christian Rossow
Abstract
Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks have long been a persistent threat to network infrastructures. Existing attack primitives require attackers to continuously send traffic, such as in SYN floods, amplification attacks, or application-layer DoS. In contrast, we study the threat of application-layer traffic loops, which are an almost cost-free attack primitive alternative. Such loops exist, e.g., if two servers consider messages sent to each other as malformed and respond with errors that again trigger error messages. Attackers can send a single IP-spoofed loop trigger packet to initiate an infinite loop among two servers. But despite the severity of traffic loops, to the best of our knowledge, they have never been studied in greater detail. In this paper, we thus investigate the threat of applicationlayer traffic loops. To this end, we propose a systematic approach to identify loops among real servers. Our core idea is to learn the response functions of all servers of a given application-layer protocol, encode this knowledge into a loop graph, and finally, traverse the graph to spot looping server pairs. Using the proposed method, we examined traffic loops among servers running both popular (DNS, NTP, and TFTP) and legacy (Daytime, Time, Active Users, Chargen, QOTD, and Echo) UDP protocols and confirmed the prevalence of traffic loops. In total, we identified approximately 296k servers in IPv4 vulnerable to traffic loops, providing attackers the opportunity to abuse billions of loop pairs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eced5430-8778-4c57-bac7-bf2e53fbb6a7Builds on5
- Global Measurement of DNS ManipulationPaul Pearce, Ben Jones, Frank Li, Roya Ensafi et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 163 citations
- SPIFFY: Inducing Cost-Detectability Tradeoffs for Persistent Link-Flooding AttacksMin Suk Kang, Virgil D. Gligor, Vyas SekarNDSS 2016 · 123 citations
- Ripple: A Programmable, Decentralized Link-Flooding Defense Against Adaptive AdversariesJiarong Xing, Wenqing Wu, Ang ChenUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- Network Hygiene, Incentives, and Regulation: Deployment of Source Address Validation in the InternetMatthew J. Luckie, Robert Beverly, Ryan Koga, Ken Keys et al.CCS 2019 · 89 citations
- Weaponizing Middleboxes for TCP Reflected AmplificationKevin Bock, Abdulrahman Alaraj, Yair Fax, Kyle Hurley et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 49 citations
Related papers
- Forwarding-Loop Attacks in Content Delivery NetworksJianjun Chen, Xiaofeng Zheng, Hai-Xin Duan, Jinjin Liang et al.NDSS 2016 · 44 citations
- Haunted by Legacy: Discovering and Exploiting Vulnerable Tunnelling HostsAngelos Beitis, Mathy VanhoefUSENIX Security 2025
- CAMP: Compositional Amplification Attacks against DNSHuayi Duan, Marco Bearzi, Jodok Vieli, David A. Basin et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Attacking the Network Time ProtocolAanchal Malhotra, Isaac E. Cohen, Erik Brakke, Sharon GoldbergNDSS 2016 · 100 citations
- Accurately Measuring Global Risk of Amplification Attacks using AmpMapSoo-Jin Moon, Yucheng Yin, Rahul Anand Sharma, Yifei Yuan et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 24 citations
