USENIX Security2017Top-tier venue
CAn't Touch This: Software-only Mitigation against Rowhammer Attacks targeting Kernel Memory
Ferdinand Brasser, Lucas Davi, David Gens, Christopher Liebchen, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
Abstract
Rowhammer is a hardware bug that can be exploited to implement privilege escalation and remote code execution attacks. Previous proposals on rowhammer mitigations either require hardware changes or follow heuristicbased approaches (based on CPU performance counters). To date, there exists no instant protection against rowhammer attacks on legacy systems.
In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a practical and efficient software-only defense against rowhammer attacks. Our defense, called CATT, prevents the attacker from leveraging rowhammer to corrupt kernel memory from user mode. To do so, we extend the physical memory allocator of the OS to physically isolate the memory of the kernel and user space. We implemented CATT on x86 and ARM to mitigate rowhammer-based kernel exploits. Our extensive evaluation shows that our mitigation (i) can stop available realworld rowhammer attacks, (ii) imposes virtually no runtime overhead for common user and kernel benchmarks as well as commonly used applications, and (iii) does not affect the stability of the overall system.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec6d7f52-1500-48ff-84dc-a6022f311bcbCited by top-tier papers65
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2018 · 288 citations
- TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row RefreshPietro Frigo, Emanuele Vannacci, Hasan Hassan, Victor van der Veen et al.S&P 2020 · 274 citations
- Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault AttacksSanghyun Hong, Pietro Frigo, Yigitcan Kaya, Cristiano Giuffrida et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 255 citations
- RAMBleed: Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing ThemAndrew Kwong, Daniel Genkin, Daniel Gruss, Yuval YaromS&P 2020 · 239 citations
Builds on4
- DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM Addressing for Cross-CPU AttacksPeter Pessl, Daniel Gruss, Clémentine Maurice, Michael Schwarz et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 500 citations
- Flip Feng Shui: Hammering a Needle in the Software StackKaveh Razavi, Ben Gras, Erik Bosman, Bart Preneel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 306 citations
- One Bit Flips, One Cloud Flops: Cross-VM Row Hammer Attacks and Privilege EscalationYuan Xiao, Xiaokuan Zhang, Yinqian Zhang, Radu TeodorescuUSENIX Security 2016 · 272 citations
- Dedup Est Machina: Memory Deduplication as an Advanced Exploitation VectorErik Bosman, Kaveh Razavi, Herbert Bos, Cristiano GiuffridaS&P 2016 · 252 citations
Related papers
- SoftTRR: Protect Page Tables against Rowhammer Attacks using Software-only Target Row RefreshZhi Zhang, Yueqiang Cheng, Minghua Wang, Wei He et al.USENIX ATC 2022 · 62 citations
- Citadel: Rethinking Memory Allocation to Safeguard Against Inter-Domain Rowhammer ExploitsAnish Saxena, Walter Wang, Alexandros DaglisMICRO 2025 · 6 citations
- PThammer: Cross-User-Kernel-Boundary Rowhammer through Implicit AccessesZhi Zhang, Yueqiang Cheng, Dongxi Liu, Surya Nepal et al.MICRO 2020 · 69 citations
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- BreakHammer: Enhancing RowHammer Mitigations by Carefully Throttling Suspect ThreadsOguzhan Canpolat, A. Giray Yaglikçi, Ataberk Olgun, Ismail Emir Yuksel et al.MICRO 2024 · 19 citations
