Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Deep Ensemble: A Membership Inference Perspective
Shahbaz Rezaei, Zubair Shafiq, Xin Liu
Abstract
Deep ensemble learning has been shown to improve accuracy by training multiple neural networks and averaging their outputs. Ensemble learning has also been suggested to defend against membership inference attacks that undermine privacy. In this paper, we empirically demonstrate a trade-off between these two goals, namely accuracy and privacy (in terms of membership inference attacks), in deep ensembles. Using a wide range of datasets and model architectures, we show that the effectiveness of membership inference attacks increases when ensembling improves accuracy. We analyze the impact of various factors in deep ensembles and demonstrate the root cause of the trade-off. Then, we evaluate common defenses against membership inference attacks based on regularization and differential privacy. We show that while these defenses can mitigate the effectiveness of membership inference attacks, they simultaneously degrade ensemble accuracy. We illustrate similar trade-off in more advanced and state-of-the-art ensembling techniques, such as snapshot ensembles and diversified ensemble networks. Finally, we propose a simple yet effective defense for deep ensembles to break the trade-off and, consequently, improve the accuracy and privacy, simultaneously.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec29fb3c-0cc9-446d-84aa-d526e20e396aCited by top-tier papers4
- Toward Efficient Membership Inference Attacks Against Federated Large Language Models: A Projection Residual ApproachGuilin Deng, Silong Chen, Yuchuan Luo, Yi Liu et al.S&P 2026 · 4 citations
- Reconstructing training data from document understanding modelsJérémie Dentan, Arnaud Paran, Aymen ShabouUSENIX Security 2024 · 3 citations
- In-Context Probing for Membership Inference in Fine-Tuned Language ModelsZhexi Lu, Hongliang Chi, Nathalie Baracaldo, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe et al.NDSS 2026 · 3 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Tools: Reliability, Disparity and EnsembleZhiqi Wang, Chengyu Zhang, Yuetian Chen, Nathalie Baracaldo et al.CCS 2025
Builds on18
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based AttackJianbo Chen, Michael I. Jordan, Martin J. WainwrightS&P 2020 · 797 citations
Related papers
- Diffence: Fencing Membership Privacy With Diffusion ModelsYuefeng Peng, Ali Naseh, Amir HoumansadrNDSS 2025
- Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership InferenceKlas Leino, Matt FredriksonUSENIX Security 2020
- Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge TransferVirat Shejwalkar, Amir HoumansadrAAAI 2021 · 130 citations
- Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident PredictionZitao Chen, Karthik PattabiramanNDSS 2024
- GAN-Leaks: A Taxonomy of Membership Inference Attacks against Generative ModelsDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Yang Zhang, Mario FritzCCS 2020 · 278 citations
