USENIX Security2024Top-tier venue
Reconstructing training data from document understanding models
Jérémie Dentan, Arnaud Paran, Aymen Shabou
Abstract
Document understanding models are increasingly employed by companies to supplant humans in processing sensitive documents, such as invoices, tax notices, or even ID cards. However, the robustness of such models to privacy attacks remains vastly unexplored. This paper presents CDMI, the first reconstruction attack designed to extract sensitive fields from the training data of these models. We attack LayoutLM and BROS architectures, demonstrating that an adversary can perfectly reconstruct up to 4.1% of the fields of the documents used for fine-tuning, including some names, dates, and invoice amounts up to six-digit numbers. When our reconstruction attack is combined with a membership inference attack, our attack accuracy escalates to 22.5%. In addition, we introduce two new end-to-end metrics and evaluate our approach under various conditions: unimodal or bimodal data, LayoutLM or BROS backbones, four fine-tuning tasks, and two public datasets (FUNSD and SROIE). We also investigate the interplay between overfitting, predictive performance, and susceptibility to our attack. We conclude with a discussion on possible defenses against our attack and potential future research directions to construct robust document understanding models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2ba32151-701b-47c9-8357-26295c3ed5dcBuilds on31
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text GenerationSumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,166 citations
Related papers
- Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language ModelsNils Lukas, Ahmed Salem, Robert Sim, Shruti Tople et al.S&P 2023
- Fragments to Facts: Partial-Information Fragment Inference from LLMsLucas Rosenblatt, Bin Han, Robert Wolfe, Bill HoweICML 2025
- DocMIA: Document-Level Membership Inference Attacks against DocVQA ModelsKhanh Nguyen, Raouf Kerkouche, Mario Fritz, Dimosthenis KaratzasICLR 2025
- Information Leakage in Embedding ModelsCongzheng Song, Ananth RaghunathanCCS 2020 · 200 citations
- Measuring Data Reconstruction Defenses in Collaborative Inference SystemsMengda Yang, Ziang Li, Juan Wang, Hongxin Hu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 18 citations
