DeepSearch: Overcome the Bottleneck of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Tree-based Search
Fang Wu, Weihao Xuan, Heli Qi, Aaron Tu, Ximing Lu, Li, Yejin Choi
Abstract
Although Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become an essential component for developing advanced reasoning skills in language models, contemporary studies have documented training plateaus after thousands of optimization steps, i.e., notable decreases in performance gains despite increased computational investment. This limitation stems from the sparse exploration patterns inherent in current RLVR practices, where models rely on limited rollouts that often miss critical reasoning paths and fail to provide systematic coverage of the solution space. We present DeepSearch, a framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) directly into RLVR training. In contrast to existing methods that rely on tree search only at inference, DeepSearch embeds structured search into the training loop, enabling systematic exploration and fine-grained credit assignment across reasoning steps. Through training-time exploration, DeepSearch addresses the fundamental bottleneck of insufficient exploration, which leads to diminishing performance gains over prolonged training. Our contributions include: (1) a global frontier selection strategy that prioritizes promising nodes across the search tree, (2) selection with entropy-based guidance that identifies confident paths for supervision, and (3) adaptive replay buffer training with solution caching for efficiency. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that DeepSearch achieves an average accuracy of 62.95% and establishes a new state-of-the-art reasoning model, while using 5.7x fewer GPU hours than extended training approaches. These results highlight the importance of strategic exploration over brute-force scaling and demonstrate the promise of algorithmic innovation for advancing RLVR methodologies. DeepSearch establishes a new direction for scaling reasoning capabilities through systematic search rather than prolonged computation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ebf0c886-1dac-4030-a0dc-21fa17fb9dd3Builds on20
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree SearchDan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Ziniu Hu, Yisong Yue et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse ExplorationZiqi Zhao, Zhaochun Ren, Jiahong Zou, Liu Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaodong Lu, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM ReasoningShubham Parashar, Shurui Gui, Xiner Li, Hongyi Ling et al.ICLR 2026 · 112 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- Exploration vs Exploitation: Rethinking RLVR through Clipping, Entropy, and Spurious RewardPeter Chen, Xiaopeng Li, Ziniu Li, Wotao Yin et al.ICLR 2026 · 28 citations
