Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals
Shuo Yang, Jinda Lu, Chiyu Ma, Kexin Huang, Haoming Meng, Qihui Zhang, Yuyang Liu, Bolin Ding, Guoyin Wang, Li Yuan, Jingren Zhou
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a central paradigm for scaling LLM reasoning, yet its optimization often suffers from training instability and suboptimal convergence. Through a systematic dissection of clipping-based GRPO-style objectives, we identify the rigid clipping decision induced by hard clipping as a key practical bottleneck in the studied RLVR setups. Specifically, our analysis suggests that informative signals can lie in the near-boundary region just beyond the clipping threshold, and are therefore discarded by the standard hard-clipping rule. Notably, once this bottleneck is precisely identified, even simple stochastic perturbations at the boundary can recover meaningful performance gains. Building on this finding, we propose Near-boundary Stochastic Rescue (NSR), a minimal, plug-andplay modification that stochastically retains these slightly out-of-bound tokens to recover lost signals. While NSR, via stochastic sampling, can be interpreted as inducing an implicit gradient decay in expectation, our ablations reveal that its stochastic, boundary-local rescue mechanism is consistently more effective than deterministic gradient decay. Validated by extensive experiments across model sizes from 7B to 30B and both dense and MoE architectures, as a plugand-play solution, NSR substantially improves training stability and delivers consistent gains over strong baselines such as DAPO and GSPO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb6dd0d2-e4c6-4344-b70a-5bbd51b8a089Builds on13
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
- Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training ExampleYiping Wang, Qing Yang, Zhiyuan Zeng, Liliang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 314 citations
- The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM ReasoningXinyu Zhu, Mengzhou Xia, Zhepei Wei, Wei-Lin Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 177 citations
Related papers
- From łog π to π: Taming Divergence in Soft Clipping via Bilateral Decoupled Decay of Probability Gradient WeightXiaoliang Fu, Jiaye Lin, Yangyi Fang, Chaowen Hu et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Turning Failures into Value: Negative Experience Replay for RLVR via Confidence Gating and Boundary Failure SamplingJialiang Guo, Fucheng Xiong, Xu He, Haodong Zhao et al.ACL 2026
- Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning for Alleviating Exploration Dilemmas in Large Language ModelsYuhua Jiang, Jiawei Huang, Yufeng Yuan, Xin Mao et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRRulin Shao, Stella Li, Rui Xin, Scott Geng et al.ICML 2026
- Towards Stable and Effective Reinforcement Learning for Mixture-of-ExpertsDi Zhang, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Lingjie Jiang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
