MetaSymNet: A Tree-like Symbol Network with Adaptive Architecture and Activation Functions
Yanjie Li, Weijun Li, Lina Yu, Min Wu, Jingyi Liu, Shu Wei, Yusong Deng, Meilan Hao
Abstract
Mathematical formulas are the language of communication between humans and nature. Discovering latent formulas from observed data is an important challenge in artificial intelligence, commonly known as symbolic regression(SR). The current mainstream SR algorithms regard SR as a combinatorial optimization problem and use Genetic Programming (GP) or Reinforcement Learning (RL) to solve the SR problem. These methods perform well on simple problems, but poorly on slightly more complex tasks. In addition, this class of algorithms ignores an important aspect: in SR tasks, symbols have explicit numerical meaning. So can we take full advantage of this important property and try to solve the SR problem with more efficient numerical optimization methods? Extrapolation and Learning Equation (EQL) replaces activation functions in neural networks with basic symbols and sparsifies connections to derive a simplified expression from a large network. However, EQL's fixed network structure can't adapt to the complexity of different tasks, often resulting in redundancy or insufficient, limiting its effectiveness. Based on the above analysis, we propose MetaSymNet, a tree-like network that employs the PANGU meta-function as its activation function. PANGU meta-function can evolve into various candidate functions during training. The network structure can also be adaptively adjusted according to different tasks. Then the symbol network evolves into a concise, interpretable mathematical expression. To evaluate the performance of MetaSymNet and five baseline algorithms, we conducted experiments across more than ten datasets, including SRBench. The experimental results show that MetaSymNet has achieved relatively excellent results on various evaluation metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ea0f7807-e6e2-4b41-8eaa-0be5c7c86324Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitySilviu-Marian Udrescu, Andrew K. Tan, Jiahai Feng, Orisvaldo Neto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 267 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- Softermax: Hardware/Software Co-Design of an Efficient Softmax for TransformersJacob R. Stevens, Rangharajan Venkatesan, Steve Dai, Brucek Khailany et al.DAC 2021 · 143 citations
Related papers
- A Neural-Guided Dynamic Symbolic Network for Exploring Mathematical Expressions from DataWenqiang Li, Weijun Li, Lina Yu, Min Wu et al.ICML 2024 · 16 citations
- Deep Generative Symbolic RegressionSamuel Holt, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality GraphNan Jiang, Ziyi Wang, Yexiang XueICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Rethinking Symbolic Regression: Morphology and Adaptability in the Context of Evolutionary AlgorithmsKei Sen Fong, Shelvia Wongso, Mehul MotaniICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- ParFam - (Neural Guided) Symbolic Regression via Continuous Global OptimizationPhilipp Scholl, Katharina Bieker, Hillary Hauger, Gitta KutyniokICLR 2025 · 1 citation
