Cross-chain Deals and Adversarial Commerce
Maurice Herlihy, Liuba Shrira, Barbara Liskov
Abstract
Modern distributed data management systems face a new challenge: how can autonomous, mutually-distrusting parties cooperate safely and effectively? Addressing this challenge brings up questions familiar from classical distributed systems: how to combine multiple steps into a single atomic action, how to recover from failures, and how to synchronize concurrent access to data. Nevertheless, each of these issues requires rethinking when participants are autonomous and potentially adversarial.
We propose the notion of a cross-chain deal, a new way to structure complex distributed computations that manage assets in an adversarial setting. Deals are inspired by classical atomic transactions, but are necessarily different, in important ways, to accommodate the decentralized and untrusting nature of the exchange. We describe novel safety and liveness properties, along with two alternative protocols for implementing cross-chain deals in a system of independent blockchain ledgers. One protocol, based on synchronous communication, is fully decentralized, while the other, based on semi-synchronous communication, requires a globally shared ledger.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9f251f4-2b81-4350-a06d-7a32c59256acCited by top-tier papers10
- A Transactional Perspective on Execute-order-validate BlockchainsPingcheng Ruan, Dumitrel Loghin, Quang-Trung Ta, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 117 citations
- ByShard: Sharding in a Byzantine EnvironmentJelle Hellings, Mohammad SadoghiVLDB 2021 · 103 citations
- SoK: Security and Privacy of Blockchain InteroperabilityAndré Augusto, Rafael Belchior, Miguel Correia, André Vasconcelos et al.S&P 2024 · 90 citations
- Blockchains vs. Distributed Databases: Dichotomy and FusionPingcheng Ruan, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Dumitrel Loghin, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 68 citations
- Blitz: Secure Multi-Hop Payments Without Two-Phase CommitsLukas Aumayr, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Aniket Kate, Matteo MaffeiUSENIX Security 2021 · 63 citations
Builds on4
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly et al.S&P 2018 · 1,145 citations
- Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts PlatformMustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn et al.NDSS 2018 · 313 citations
- Bolt: Anonymous Payment Channels for Decentralized CurrenciesMatthew Green, Ian MiersCCS 2017 · 281 citations
- Atomic Commitment Across BlockchainsVictor Zakhary, Divy Agrawal, Amr El AbbadiVLDB 2020 · 107 citations
Related papers
- Universal Atomic Swaps: Secure Exchange of Coins Across All BlockchainsSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Giulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-SanchezS&P 2022 · 112 citations
- BrokerAS: Towards Fault-tolerant Atomic Cross-chain SwapsGaowei Shi, Xiulong Liu, Huan Wang, Yuhan Li et al.INFOCOM 2025 · 10 citations
- Safe Serializable Secure Scheduling: Transactions and the Trade-Off Between Security and ConsistencyIsaac C. Sheff, Tom Magrino, Jed Liu, Andrew C. Myers et al.CCS 2016 · 9 citations
- CALYPSO: Private Data Management for Decentralized LedgersEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Enis Ceyhun Alp, Linus Gasser, Philipp Jovanovic et al.VLDB 2021 · 51 citations
- Warning! The Timeout T Cannot Protect You From Losing Coins: PipeSwap: Forcing the Timely Release of a Secret for Atomic Cross-Chain SwapsPeifang Ni, Anqi Tian, Jing XuS&P 2025
