Atomic Commitment Across Blockchains
Victor Zakhary, Divy Agrawal, Amr El Abbadi
Abstract
The recent adoption of blockchain technologies and open permissionless networks suggest the importance of peer-to-peer atomic cross-chain transaction protocols. Users should be able to atomically exchange tokens and assets without depending on centralized intermediaries such as exchanges. Recent peer-to-peer atomic cross-chain swap protocols use hashlocks and timelocks to ensure that participants comply to the protocol. However, an expired timelock could lead to a violation of the all-or-nothing atomicity property. An honest participant who fails to execute a smart contract on time due to a crash failure, denial of service attacks or even network delays might end up losing assets. Although a crashed participant is the only participant who ends up worse off, current proposals are unsuitable for atomic cross-chain transactions in asynchronous environments where crash failures and network delays are the norm. In this paper, we present AC3WN, the first decentralized all-or-nothing atomic cross-chain commitment protocol. The redeem and refund events of the smart contracts that exchange assets are modeled as conflicting events. An open permissionless network of witnesses is used to guarantee that conflicting events could never simultaneously occur and either all smart contracts in an atomic cross-chain transaction are redeemed or all of them are refunded.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- A Transactional Perspective on Execute-order-validate BlockchainsPingcheng Ruan, Dumitrel Loghin, Quang-Trung Ta, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 117 citations
- ByShard: Sharding in a Byzantine EnvironmentJelle Hellings, Mohammad SadoghiVLDB 2021 · 103 citations
- SoK: Security and Privacy of Blockchain InteroperabilityAndré Augusto, Rafael Belchior, Miguel Correia, André Vasconcelos et al.S&P 2024 · 90 citations
- Authenticated Keyword Search in Scalable Hybrid-Storage BlockchainsCe Zhang, Cheng Xu, Haixin Wang, Jianliang Xu et al.ICDE 2021 · 88 citations
- Cross-chain Deals and Adversarial CommerceMaurice Herlihy, Liuba Shrira, Barbara LiskovVLDB 2020 · 61 citations
Builds on2
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja et al.CCS 2016 · 1,392 citations
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 769 citations
Related papers
- Parallelizing Universal Atomic Swaps for Multi-Chain Cryptocurrency ExchangesDanlei Xiao, Chuan Zhang, Haotian Deng, Jinwen Liang et al.USENIX Security 2025
- BrokerAS: Towards Fault-tolerant Atomic Cross-chain SwapsGaowei Shi, Xiulong Liu, Huan Wang, Yuhan Li et al.INFOCOM 2025 · 10 citations
- Universal Atomic Swaps: Secure Exchange of Coins Across All BlockchainsSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Giulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-SanchezS&P 2022 · 112 citations
- XCLAIM: Trustless, Interoperable, Cryptocurrency-Backed AssetsAlexei Zamyatin, Dominik Harz, Joshua Lind, Panayiotis Panayiotou et al.S&P 2019 · 222 citations
- Warning! The Timeout T Cannot Protect You From Losing Coins: PipeSwap: Forcing the Timely Release of a Secret for Atomic Cross-Chain SwapsPeifang Ni, Anqi Tian, Jing XuS&P 2025
