Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission Control
Lucas Weber, Ana Busic, Jiamin Zhu
Abstract
The expected regret of any reinforcement learning algorithm is lower bounded by for undiscounted returns, where is the diameter of the Markov decision process, the size of the state space, the size of the action space and the number of time steps. However, this lower bound is general. A smaller regret can be obtained by taking into account some specific knowledge of the problem structure. In this article, we consider an admission control problem to an queue with job classes and class-dependent rewards and holding costs. Queuing systems often have a diameter that is exponential in the buffer size , making the previous lower bound prohibitive for any practical use. We propose an algorithm inspired by UCRL2, and use the structure of the problem to upper bound the expected total regret by in the finite server case. In the infinite server case, we prove that the dependence of the regret on disappears.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9dd37af-bac8-42ad-9fde-7e0d44de8a0aCited by top-tier papers2
- Near-Optimal Regret-Queue Length Tradeoff in Online Learning for Two-Sided MarketsZixian Yang, Sushil Mahavir Varma, Lei YingNeurIPS 2025
- Offline Actor-Critic for Average Reward MDPsWilliam G. Powell, Jeongyeol Kwon, Qiaomin Xie, Hanbaek LyuNeurIPS 2025
Builds on2
- Tightening Exploration in Upper Confidence Reinforcement LearningHippolyte Bourel, Odalric Maillard, Mohammad Sadegh TalebiICML 2020 · 38 citations
- Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State SpaceJonatha Anselmi, Bruno Gaujal, Louis-Sébastien RebuffiNeurIPS 2022 · 3 citations
Related papers
- UCB Momentum Q-learning: Correcting the bias without forgettingPierre Ménard, Omar Darwiche Domingues, Xuedong Shang, Michal ValkoICML 2021 · 53 citations
- Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRMax Simchowitz, Dylan J. FosterICML 2020 · 209 citations
- Efficient Exploration in Average-Reward Constrained Reinforcement Learning: Achieving Near-Optimal Regret With Posterior SamplingDanil Provodin, Maurits Clemens Kaptein, Mykola PechenizkiyICML 2024
- No-Regret Exploration in Goal-Oriented Reinforcement LearningJean Tarbouriech, Evrard Garcelon, Michal Valko, Matteo Pirotta et al.ICML 2020 · 48 citations
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with loglog(T) Switching CostDan Qiao, Ming Yin, Ming Min, Yu-Xiang WangICML 2022 · 35 citations
