Tightening Exploration in Upper Confidence Reinforcement Learning
Hippolyte Bourel, Odalric Maillard, Mohammad Sadegh Talebi
Abstract
The upper confidence reinforcement learning (UCRL2) algorithm introduced in (Jaksch et al., 2010) is a popular method to perform regret minimization in unknown discrete Markov Decision Processes under the average-reward criterion. Despite its nice and generic theoretical regret guarantees, this algorithm and its variants have remained until now mostly theoretical as numerical experiments in simple environments exhibit long burn-in phases before the learning takes place. In pursuit of practical efficiency, we present UCRL3, following the lines of UCRL2, but with two key modifications: First, it uses state-of-the-art time-uniform concentration inequalities to compute confidence sets on the reward and (component-wise) transition distributions for each state-action pair. Furthermore, to tighten exploration, it uses an adaptive computation of the support of each transition distribution, which in turn enables us to revisit the extended value iteration procedure of UCRL2 to optimize over distributions with reduced support by disregarding low probability transitions, while still ensuring near-optimism. We demonstrate, through numerical experiments in standard environments, that reducing exploration this way yields a substantial numerical improvement compared to UCRL2 and its variants. On the theoretical side, these key modifications enable us to derive a regret bound for UCRL3 improving on UCRL2, that for the first time makes appear notions of local diameter and local effective support, thanks to variance-aware concentration bounds.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7966a092-ff21-4e55-b732-0ede3a35a8d9Cited by top-tier papers8
- Achieving Tractable Minimax Optimal Regret in Average Reward MDPsVictor Boone, Zihan ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- Finding good policies in average-reward Markov Decision Processes without prior knowledgeAdrienne Tuynman, Rémy Degenne, Emilie KaufmannNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- IMED-RL: Regret optimal learning of ergodic Markov decision processesFabien Pesquerel, Odalric-Ambrym MaillardNeurIPS 2022 · 12 citations
- Multiple-Play Stochastic Bandits with Shareable Finite-Capacity ArmsXuchuang Wang, Hong Xie, John C. S. LuiICML 2022 · 8 citations
- Reinforcement Learning in a Birth and Death Process: Breaking the Dependence on the State SpaceJonatha Anselmi, Bruno Gaujal, Louis-Sébastien RebuffiNeurIPS 2022 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Markov Decision Processes: The Blessing of (More) OptimismWang Chi Cheung, David Simchi-Levi, Ruihao ZhuICML 2020 · 114 citations
- UCB Momentum Q-learning: Correcting the bias without forgettingPierre Ménard, Omar Darwiche Domingues, Xuedong Shang, Michal ValkoICML 2021 · 53 citations
- Achieving Constant Regret in Linear Markov Decision ProcessesWeitong Zhang, Zhiyuan Fan, Jiafan He, Quanquan GuNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Reinforcement Learning and Regret Bounds for Admission ControlLucas Weber, Ana Busic, Jiamin ZhuICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Near-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Episodic MDPsWeichao Mao, Kaiqing Zhang, Ruihao Zhu, David Simchi-Levi et al.ICML 2021 · 49 citations
