Learning in an Echo Chamber: Online Learning with Replay Adversary
Daniil Dmitriev, Harald Eskelund Franck, Carolin Heinzler, Amartya Sanyal
Abstract
As machine learning systems increasingly train on self-annotated data, they risk reinforcing errors and becoming echo chambers of their own beliefs. We model this phenomenon by introducing a learning-theoretic framework: Online Learning in the Replay Setting. In round t, the learner outputs a hypothesis ĥt ; the adversary then reveals either the true label f * (x t ) or a replayed label ĥi (x t ) from an earlier round i < t. A mistake is counted only when the true label is shown, yet classical algorithms such as the SOA or the halving algorithm are easily misled by the replayed errors. We introduce the Extended Threshold dimension, ExThD (H), and prove matching upper and lower bounds that make ExThD (H) the exact measure of learnability in this model. A closure-based learner makes at most ExThD (H) mistakes against any adaptive adversary, and no algorithm can perform better. For stochastic adversaries, we prove a similar bound for every intersection-closed class. The replay setting is provably harder than the classical mistake bound setting: some classes have constant Littlestone dimension but arbitrarily large ExThD (H). Proper learning exhibits an even sharper separation: a class is properly learnable under replay if and only if it is (almost) intersection-closed. Otherwise, every proper learner suffers Ω (T ) errors, whereas our improper algorithm still achieves the ExThD (H) bound. These results give the first tight analysis of learning against replay adversaries, based on new results for closure-type algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningYuki Markus Asano, Christian Rupprecht, Andrea VedaldiICLR 2020 · 873 citations
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADSina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun et al.ICLR 2024 · 279 citations
- Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative RiskJohn Miller, Juan C. Perdomo, Tijana ZrnicICML 2021 · 128 citations
- Adversarial Resilience in Sequential Prediction via AbstentionSurbhi Goel, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Abhishek ShettyNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
Related papers
- A Trichotomy for Transductive Online LearningSteve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Jonathan ShaferNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
- Optimal Mistake Bounds for Transductive Online LearningZachary Chase, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Jonathan ShaferNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private LearningNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyNeurIPS 2020 · 66 citations
- Tradeoffs between Mistakes and ERM Oracle Calls in Online and Transductive Online LearningIdan Attias, Steve Hanneke, Arvind RamaswamiNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
