Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inference
Pablo Lemos, Adam Coogan, Yashar Hezaveh, Laurence Perreault Levasseur
Abstract
Parameter inference, i.e. inferring the posterior distribution of the parameters of a statistical model given some data, is a central problem to many scientific disciplines. Generative models can be used as an alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for conducting posterior inference, both in likelihood-based and simulation-based problems. However, assessing the accuracy of posteriors encoded in generative models is not straightforward. In this paper, we introduce `Tests of Accuracy with Random Points' (TARP) coverage testing as a method to estimate coverage probabilities of generative posterior estimators. Our method differs from previously-existing coverage-based methods, which require posterior evaluations. We prove that our approach is necessary and sufficient to show that a posterior estimator is accurate. We demonstrate the method on a variety of synthetic examples, and show that TARP can be used to test the results of posterior inference analyses in high-dimensional spaces. We also show that our method can detect inaccurate inferences in cases where existing methods fail.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9504a92-1cc8-4a6c-9d07-90754d0d0734Cited by top-tier papers12
- Multifidelity Simulation-based Inference for Computationally Expensive SimulatorsAnastasia Nastya Krouglova, Hayden R. Johnson, Basile Confavreux, Michael Deistler et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage ProbabilityMaciej Falkiewicz, Naoya Takeishi, Imahn Shekhzadeh, Antoine Wehenkel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Effortless, Simulation-Efficient Bayesian Inference using Tabular Foundation ModelsJulius Vetter, Manuel Glöckler, Daniel Gedon, Jakob H. MackeNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Variational Inference with Coverage Guarantees in Simulation-Based InferenceYash P. Patel, Declan McNamara, Jackson Loper, Jeffrey Regier et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Conformal C2ST: Turning weak classifiers into strong two-sample testsVansh Bansal, Tianyu Chen, James ScottICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on8
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Likelihood-free MCMC with Amortized Approximate Ratio EstimatorsJoeri Hermans, Volodimir Begy, Gilles LouppeICML 2020 · 246 citations
- On Contrastive Learning for Likelihood-free InferenceConor Durkan, Iain Murray, George PapamakariosICML 2020 · 149 citations
- Truncated proposals for scalable and hassle-free simulation-based inferenceMichael Deistler, Pedro J. Gonçalves, Jakob H. MackeNeurIPS 2022 · 76 citations
Related papers
- L-C2ST: Local Diagnostics for Posterior Approximations in Simulation-Based InferenceJulia Linhart, Alexandre Gramfort, Pedro RodriguesNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- CoLT: The conditional localization test for assessing the accuracy of neural posterior estimatesTianyu Chen, Vansh Bansal, James G. ScottNeurIPS 2025
- Confidence Sets and Hypothesis Testing in a Likelihood-Free Inference SettingNiccolò Dalmasso, Rafael Izbicki, Ann B. LeeICML 2020 · 30 citations
- Gaussian Process Modeling of Approximate Inference Errors for Variational AutoencodersMinyoung KimCVPR 2022 · 2 citations
- Addressing Misspecification in Simulation-based Inference through Data-driven CalibrationAntoine Wehenkel, Juan L. Gamella, Ozan Sener, Jens Behrmann et al.ICML 2025
