Individual and Group-wise Classroom Seating Experience: Effects on Student Engagement in Different Courses
Nan Gao, Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman, Wei Shao, Kaixin Ji, Flora D. Salim
Abstract
Seating location in the classroom can affect student engagement, attention and academic performance by providing better visibility, improved movement, and participation in discussions. Existing studies typically explore how traditional seating arrangements (e.g. grouped tables or traditional rows) influence students' perceived engagement, without considering group seating behaviours under more flexible seating arrangements. Furthermore, survey-based measures of student engagement are prone to subjectivity and various response bias. Therefore, in this research, we investigate how individual and group-wise classroom seating experiences affect student engagement using wearable physiological sensors. We conducted a field study at a high school and collected survey and wearable data from 23 students in 10 courses over four weeks. We aim to answer the following research questions: 1. How does the seating proximity between students relate to their perceived learning engagement? 2. How do students' group seating behaviours relate to their physiologically-based measures of engagement (i.e. physiological arousal and physiological synchrony)? Experiment results indicate that the individual and group-wise classroom seating experience is associated with perceived student engagement and physiologically-based engagement measured from electrodermal activity. We also find that students who sit close together are more likely to have similar learning engagement and tend to have high physiological synchrony. This research opens up opportunities to explore the implications of flexible seating arrangements and has great potential to maximize student engagement by suggesting intelligent seating choices in the future.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8ecc86b-7f08-4011-a52b-c270f4c4579dCited by top-tier papers3
- ClassID: Enabling Student Behavior Attribution from Ambient Classroom Sensing SystemsPrasoon Patidar, Tricia J. Ngoon, John Zimmerman, Amy Ogan et al.UbiComp 2024 · 7 citations
- Hi-OSCAR: Hierarchical Open-set Classifier for Human Activity RecognitionConor McCarthy, Loes Quirijnen, Jan Peter van Zandwijk, Zeno Geradts et al.UbiComp 2026 · 4 citations
- Division of Labor and Collaboration Between Parents in Family EducationZiyi Wang, Congrong Zhang, Jingying Deng, Xiaofan Hu et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- n-Gage: Predicting in-class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the WildNan Gao, Wei Shao, Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman, Flora D. SalimUbiComp 2020 · 60 citations
- Reading the Room: Automated, Momentary Assessment of Student Engagement in the Classroom: Are We There Yet?Betsy DiSalvo, Dheeraj Bandaru, Qiaosi Wang, Hong Li et al.UbiComp 2022 · 16 citations
- Digital Transformations of Classrooms in Virtual RealityHong Gao, Efe Bozkir, Lisa Hasenbein, Jens-Uwe Hahn et al.CHI 2021 · 69 citations
- Affect Recognition using Psychophysiological Correlates in High Intensity VR ExergamingSoumya C. Barathi, Michael J. Proulx, Eamonn O'Neill, Christof LutterothCHI 2020 · 39 citations
- Sweating the Details: Emotion Recognition and the Influence of Physical Exertion in Virtual Reality ExergamingDominic Potts, Zoe Broad, Tarini Sehgal, Joseph Hartley et al.CHI 2024 · 14 citations
