Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions
Michael Saxon, Sharon Levy, Xinyi Wang, Alon Albalak, William Yang Wang
Abstract
Broader disclosive transparency-truth and clarity in communication regarding the function of AI systems-is widely considered desirable. Unfortunately, it is a nebulous concept, difficult to both define and quantify. This is problematic, as previous work has demonstrated possible trade-offs and negative consequences to disclosive transparency, such as a confusion effect, where "too much information" clouds a reader's understanding of what a system description means. Disclosive transparency's subjective nature has rendered deep study into these problems and their remedies difficult. To improve this state of affairs, We introduce neural language model-based probabilistic metrics to directly model disclosive transparency, and demonstrate that they correlate with user and expert opinions of system transparency, making them a valid objective proxy. Finally, we demonstrate the use of these metrics in a pilot study quantifying the relationships between transparency, confusion, and user perceptions in a corpus of real NLP system descriptions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e73be751-33cb-4f3c-b397-f70d8812b813Builds on6
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of DataEmily M. Bender, Alexander KollerACL 2020 · 914 citations
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and NeedsSungsoo Ray Hong, Jessica Hullman, Enrico BertiniCSCW 2020 · 219 citations
Related papers
- Metrics for What, Metrics for Whom: Assessing Actionability of Bias Evaluation Metrics in NLPPieter Delobelle, Giuseppe Attanasio, Debora Nozza, Su Lin Blodgett et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- ConSim: Measuring Concept-Based Explanations' Effectiveness with Automated SimulatabilityAntonin Poché, Alon Jacovi, Agustin Martin Picard, Victor Boutin et al.ACL 2025 · 8 citations
- What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability MethodsJulien Colin, Thomas Fel, Rémi Cadène, Thomas SerreNeurIPS 2022 · 147 citations
- Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code ReviewZhenhan Gao, Marvin Muñoz Barón, Umm-e Habiba, Daniel Graziotin et al.ISSTA 2026
- HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMsMyra Cheng, Sunny Yu, Dan JurafskyACL 2025
