SymGPT: Auditing Smart Contracts via Combining Symbolic Execution with Large Language Models
Shihao Xia, Mengting He, Shuai Shao, Tingting Yu, Yiying Zhang, Nobuko Yoshida, Linhai Song
Abstract
To govern smart contracts running on Ethereum, multiple Ethereum Request for Comment (ERC) standards have been developed, each defining a set of rules governing contract behavior. Violating these rules can cause serious security issues and financial losses, signifying the importance of verifying ERC compliance. Today's practices of such verification include manual audits, expert-developed program-analysis tools, and large language models (LLMs), all of which remain ineffective at detecting ERC rule violations.
This paper introduces SymGPT, a tool that combines LLMs with symbolic execution to automatically verify smart contracts' compliance with ERC rules. We begin by empirically analyzing 132 ERC rules from three major ERC standards, examining their content, security implications, and natural language descriptions. Based on this study, SymGPT instructs an LLM to translate ERC rules into a domain-specific language, synthesizes constraints from the translated rules to model potential rule violations, and performs symbolic execution for violation detection. Our evaluation shows that SymGPT identifies 5,783 ERC rule violations in 4,000 realworld contracts, including 1,375 violations with clear attack paths for financial theft. Furthermore, SymGPT outperforms six automated techniques and a security-expert auditing service, underscoring its superiority over current smart contract analysis methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6784450-8a33-4522-bf1a-b0371d6cf0efBuilds on51
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
Related papers
- ETHBMC: A Bounded Model Checker for Smart ContractsJoel Frank, Cornelius Aschermann, Thorsten HolzUSENIX Security 2020
- Symbolic value-flow static analysis: deep, precise, complete modeling of Ethereum smart contractsYannis Smaragdakis, Neville Grech, Sifis Lagouvardos, Konstantinos Triantafyllou et al.OOPSLA 2021 · 18 citations
- SmarTest: Effectively Hunting Vulnerable Transaction Sequences in Smart Contracts through Language Model-Guided Symbolic ExecutionSunbeom So, Seongjoon Hong, Hakjoo OhUSENIX Security 2021 · 118 citations
- Augmenting Multi-technique Static Analysis with Large Language Models: A Neuro-symbolic Approach to Smart Contract Vulnerability DetectionJunxiang Wang, Fu Song, Miaomiao Zhang, Bowen Du et al.ISSTA 2026
- SmartCoCo: Checking Comment-Code Inconsistency in Smart Contracts via Constraint Propagation and BindingSicheng Hao, Yuhong Nan, Zibin Zheng, Xiaohui LiuASE 2023 · 7 citations
