Mystique: Uncovering Information Leakage from Browser Extensions
Quan Chen, Alexandros Kapravelos
Abstract
Browser extensions are small JavaScript, CSS and HTML programs that run inside the browser with special privileges. These programs, often written by third parties, operate on the pages that the browser is visiting, giving the user a programmatic way to configure the browser. The privacy implications that arise by allowing privileged third-party code to execute inside the users' browser are not well understood. In this paper, we develop a taint analysis framework for browser extensions and use it to perform a large scale study of extensions in regard to their privacy practices. We first present a hybrid approach to traditional taint analysis: by leveraging the fact that extension source code is available to the runtime JavaScript engine, we implement as well as enhance traditional taint analysis using information gathered from static data flow and control-flow analysis of the JavaScript source code. Based on this, we further modify the Chromium browser to support taint tracking for extensions. We analyzed 178,893 extensions crawled from the Chrome Web Store between September 2016 and March 2018, as well as a separate set of all available extensions (2,790 in total) for the Opera browser at the time of analysis. From these, our analysis flagged 3,868 (2.13%) extensions as potentially leaking privacy-sensitive information. The top 10 most popular Chrome extensions that we confirmed to be leaking privacy-sensitive information have more than 60 million users combined. We ran the analysis on a local Kubernetes cluster and were able to finish within a month, demonstrating the feasibility of our approach for large-scale analysis of browser extensions. At the same time, our results emphasize the threat browser extensions pose to user privacy, and the need for countermeasures to safeguard against misbehaving extensions that abuse their privileges.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6309a1b-ee22-4e8c-a0b1-5b719a3553a4Cited by top-tier papers26
- Cookie Swap Party: Abusing First-Party Cookies for Web TrackingQuan Chen, Panagiotis Ilia, Michalis Polychronakis, Alexandros KapravelosWWW 2021 · 57 citations
- Fingerprinting in Style: Detecting Browser Extensions via Injected Style SheetsPierre Laperdrix, Oleksii Starov, Quan Chen, Alexandros Kapravelos et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 49 citations
- Latex Gloves: Protecting Browser Extensions from Probing and Revelation AttacksAlexander Sjösten, Steven Van Acker, Pablo Picazo-Sanchez, Andrei SabelfeldNDSS 2019 · 36 citations
- You've Changed: Detecting Malicious Browser Extensions through their Update DeltasNikolaos Pantelaios, Nick Nikiforakis, Alexandros KapravelosCCS 2020 · 34 citations
- CookieGraph: Understanding and Detecting First-Party Tracking CookiesShaoor Munir, Sandra Deepthy Siby, Umar Iqbal, Steven Englehardt et al.CCS 2023 · 22 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Arcanum: Detecting and Evaluating the Privacy Risks of Browser Extensions on Web Pages and Web ContentQinge Xie, Manoj Vignesh Kasi Murali, Paul Pearce, Frank LiUSENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
- EmPoWeb: Empowering Web Applications with Browser ExtensionsDolière Francis SoméS&P 2019 · 60 citations
- PanoptiChrome: A Modern In-browser Taint Analysis FrameworkRahul Kanyal, Smruti R. SarangiWWW 2024 · 5 citations
- The Dangers of Human Touch: Fingerprinting Browser Extensions through User ActionsKonstantinos Solomos, Panagiotis Ilia, Soroush Karami, Nick Nikiforakis et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Experimental Security Analysis of Sensitive Data Access by Browser ExtensionsAsmit Nayak, Rishabh Khandelwal, Earlence Fernandes, Kassem FawazWWW 2024 · 12 citations
