BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shift
Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras, Aleksander Madry
Abstract
We develop a methodology for assessing the robustness of models to subpopulation shift---specifically, their ability to generalize to novel data subpopulations that were not observed during training. Our approach leverages the class structure underlying existing datasets to control the data subpopulations that comprise the training and test distributions. This enables us to synthesize realistic distribution shifts whose sources can be precisely controlled and characterized, within existing large-scale datasets. Applying this methodology to the ImageNet dataset, we create a suite of subpopulation shift benchmarks of varying granularity. We then validate that the corresponding shifts are tractable by obtaining human baselines for them. Finally, we utilize these benchmarks to measure the sensitivity of standard model architectures as well as the effectiveness of off-the-shelf train-time robustness interventions. Code and data available at this https URL .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5d0b857-20a9-4582-bb62-fea058fc9a67Cited by top-tier papers102
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 454 citations
- Accuracy on the Line: on the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution GeneralizationJohn Miller, Rohan Taori, Aditi Raghunathan, Shiori Sagawa et al.ICML 2021 · 323 citations
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
Builds on6
- Random Erasing Data AugmentationZhun Zhong, Liang Zheng, Guoliang Kang, Shaozi Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 4,134 citations
- Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain AdaptationXingchao Peng, Qinxun Bai, Xide Xia, Zijun Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,239 citations
- Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image ClassificationRohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?Hadi Salman, Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Ashish Kapoor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 506 citations
- From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on BenchmarksDimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas et al.ICML 2020 · 146 citations
Related papers
- Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation ShiftYuzhe Yang, Haoran Zhang, Dina Katabi, Marzyeh GhassemiICML 2023 · 149 citations
- OODRobustBench: a Benchmark and Large-Scale Analysis of Adversarial Robustness under Distribution ShiftLin Li, Yifei Wang, Chawin Sitawarin, Michael W. SpratlingICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Benchmarking Low-Shot Robustness to Natural Distribution ShiftsAaditya Singh, Kartik Sarangmath, Prithvijit Chattopadhyay, Judy HoffmanICCV 2023 · 3 citations
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training ConflictsWeixin Liang, James ZouICLR 2022 · 103 citations
