Accuracy on the Line: on the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalization
John Miller, Rohan Taori, Aditi Raghunathan, Shiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Vaishaal Shankar, Percy Liang, Yair Carmon, Ludwig Schmidt
Abstract
For machine learning systems to be reliable, we must understand their performance in unseen, out-of-distribution environments. In this paper, we empirically show that out-of-distribution performance is strongly correlated with in-distribution performance for a wide range of models and distribution shifts. Specifically, we demonstrate strong correlations between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on variants of CIFAR-10 & ImageNet, a synthetic pose estimation task derived from YCB objects, satellite imagery classification in FMoW-WILDS, and wildlife classification in iWildCam-WILDS. The strong correlations hold across model architectures, hyperparameters, training set size, and training duration, and are more precise than what is expected from existing domain adaptation theory. To complete the picture, we also investigate cases where the correlation is weaker, for instance some synthetic distribution shifts from CIFAR-10-C and the tissue classification dataset Camelyon17-WILDS. Finally, we provide a candidate theory based on a Gaussian data model that shows how changes in the data covariance arising from distribution shift can affect the observed correlations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers129
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelsMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Jong Wook Kim, Mike Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 364 citations
- On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious CorrelationsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Nate Gruver, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2022 · 208 citations
Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
Related papers
- Predicting with Confidence on Unseen DistributionsDevin Guillory, Vaishaal Shankar, Sayna Ebrahimi, Trevor Darrell et al.ICCV 2021 · 141 citations
- Leveraging unlabeled data to predict out-of-distribution performanceSaurabh Garg, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Zachary Chase Lipton, Behnam Neyshabur et al.ICLR 2022 · 160 citations
- Distribution Shift Is Key to Learning Invariant PredictionHong Zheng, Fei TengAAAI 2026
- Connect Later: Improving Fine-tuning for Robustness with Targeted AugmentationsHelen Qu, Sang Michael XieICML 2024 · 6 citations
- A Unified Framework for Robustness on Diverse Sampling ErrorsMyeongho Jeon, Myungjoo Kang, Joonseok LeeICCV 2023 · 1 citation
