Distribution Shift Is Key to Learning Invariant Prediction
Hong Zheng, Fei Teng
Abstract
An interesting phenomenon arises: Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) sometimes outperforms methods specifically designed for out-of-distribution tasks. This motivates an investigation into the reasons behind such behavior beyond algorithmic design. In this study, we find that one such reason lies in the distribution shift across training domains. A large degree of distribution shift can lead to better performance even under ERM. Specifically, we derive several theoretical and empirical findings demonstrating that distribution shift plays a crucial role in model learning and benefits learning invariant prediction. Firstly, the proposed upper bounds indicate that the degree of distribution shift directly affects the prediction ability of the learned models. If it is large, the models’ ability can increase, approximating invariant prediction models that make stable predictions under arbitrary known or unseen domains; and vice versa. We also prove that, under certain data conditions, ERM solutions can achieve performance comparable to that of invariant prediction models. Secondly, the empirical validation results demonstrated that the predictions of learned models approximate those of Oracle or Optimal models, provided that the degree of distribution shift in the training data increases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 69f8e1f1-5e0e-4e14-a15b-47187fc6ec08Builds on17
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Gradient Matching for Domain GeneralizationYuge Shi, Jeffrey Seely, Philip H. S. Torr, Siddharth Narayanaswamy et al.ICLR 2022 · 358 citations
- The Risks of Invariant Risk MinimizationElan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2021 · 356 citations
- Invariant Risk Minimization GamesKartik Ahuja, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Kush R. Varshney, Amit DhurandharICML 2020 · 289 citations
- Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk MinimizationCian Eastwood, Alexander Robey, Shashank Singh, Julius von Kügelgen et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 99 citations
Related papers
- Bayesian Invariant Risk MinimizationYong Lin, Hanze Dong, Hao Wang, Tong ZhangCVPR 2022 · 48 citations
- Heterogeneous Risk MinimizationJiashuo Liu, Zheyuan Hu, Peng Cui, Bo Li et al.ICML 2021 · 170 citations
- Regularization Penalty Optimization for Addressing Data Quality Variance in OoD AlgorithmsRunpeng Yu, Hong Zhu, Kaican Li, Lanqing Hong et al.AAAI 2022 · 6 citations
- Adaptive Risk Minimization: Learning to Adapt to Domain ShiftMarvin Zhang, Henrik Marklund, Nikita Dhawan, Abhishek Gupta et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 284 citations
- Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity PerspectiveKartik Ahuja, Jun Wang, Amit Dhurandhar, Karthikeyan Shanmugam et al.ICLR 2021 · 15 citations
