On the (In)security of Peer-to-Peer Decentralized Machine Learning
Dario Pasquini, Mathilde Raynal, Carmela Troncoso
Abstract
In this work, we carry out the first, in-depth, privacy analysis of Decentralized Learning—a collaborative machine learning framework aimed at addressing the main limitations of federated learning. We introduce a suite of novel attacks for both passive and active decentralized adversaries. We demonstrate that, contrary to what is claimed by decentralized learning proposers, decentralized learning does not offer any security advantage over federated learning. Rather, it increases the attack surface enabling any user in the system to perform privacy attacks such as gradient inversion, and even gain full control over honest users’ local model. We also show that, given the state of the art in protections, privacy-preserving configurations of decentralized learning require fully connected networks, losing any practical advantage over the federated setup and therefore completely defeating the objective of the decentralized approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5c107a8-e688-4fb0-b0e8-e081e21207ffCited by top-tier papers9
- Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated LearningMinghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi, Prashant Khanduri et al.CCS 2024 · 38 citations
- Privacy Attacks in Decentralized LearningAbdellah El Mrini, Edwige Cyffers, Aurélien BelletICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Differentially Private Decentralized Learning with Random WalksEdwige Cyffers, Aurélien Bellet, Jalaj UpadhyayICML 2024 · 10 citations
- CaPS: Collaborative and Private Synthetic Data Generation from Distributed SourcesSikha Pentyala, Mayana Pereira, Martine De CockICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Boosting Asynchronous Decentralized Learning with Model FragmentationSayan Biswas, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Alexis Marouani, Rafael Pires et al.WWW 2025 · 6 citations
Builds on28
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative LearningLuca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2019 · 1,736 citations
Related papers
- Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split LearningDario Pasquini, Giuseppe Ateniese, Massimo BernaschiCCS 2021 · 14 citations
- On the Detectability of Active Gradient Inversion Attacks in Federated LearningVincenzo Carletti, Pasquale Foggia, Carlo Mazzocca, Giuseppe Parrella et al.S&P 2026 · 1 citation
- Theoretically Unmasking Inference Attacks Against LDP-Protected Clients in Federated Vision ModelsQuan Minh Nguyen, Minh N. Vu, Truc Nguyen, My T. ThaiICML 2025
- Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated LearningJunyi Zhu, Ruicong Yao, Matthew B. BlaschkoICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep LearningBriland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, Fernando Pérez-CruzCCS 2017 · 1,581 citations
