Differentially Private Decentralized Learning with Random Walks
Edwige Cyffers, Aurélien Bellet, Jalaj Upadhyay
Abstract
The popularity of federated learning comes from the possibility of better scalability and the ability for participants to keep control of their data, improving data security and sovereignty. Unfortunately, sharing model updates also creates a new privacy attack surface. In this work, we characterize the privacy guarantees of decentralized learning with random walk algorithms, where a model is updated by traveling from one node to another along the edges of a communication graph. Using a recent variant of differential privacy tailored to the study of decentralized algorithms, namely Pairwise Network Differential Privacy, we derive closed-form expressions for the privacy loss between each pair of nodes where the impact of the communication topology is captured by graph theoretic quantities. Our results further reveal that random walk algorithms tends to yield better privacy guarantees than gossip algorithms for nodes close from each other. We supplement our theoretical results with empirical evaluation on synthetic and real-world graphs and datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dea5cac7-61e5-475a-948f-b6c8d343bd56Cited by top-tier papers5
- Mitigating the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in Decentralized Federated Learning via f-Differential PrivacyXiang Li, Chendi Wang, Buxin Su, Qi Long et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- On The Surprising Effectiveness of a Single Global Merging in Decentralized LearningTongtian Zhu, Tianyu Zhang, Mingze Wang, Zhanpeng Zhou et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Credibility-Aware Weighting Federated Causal Discovery for Time SeriesJiegang Xu, Fuyuan CAO, Jiye LiangICML 2026
- Row-Stochastic Matrices Can Provably Outperform Doubly Stochastic Matrices in Decentralized LearningBing Liu, Boao Kong, Limin Lu, Kun Yuan et al.ICML 2026
- DICE: Data Influence Cascade in Decentralized LearningTongtian Zhu, Wenhao Li, Can Wang, Fengxiang HeICLR 2025
Builds on13
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local UpdatesAnastasia Koloskova, Nicolas Loizou, Sadra Boreiri, Martin Jaggi et al.ICML 2020 · 623 citations
Related papers
- Muffliato: Peer-to-Peer Privacy Amplification for Decentralized Optimization and AveragingEdwige Cyffers, Mathieu Even, Aurélien Bellet, Laurent MassouliéNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- FedWalk: Communication Efficient Federated Unsupervised Node Embedding with Differential PrivacyQiying Pan, Yifei ZhuKDD 2022 · 20 citations
- Unified Privacy Guarantees for Decentralized Learning via Matrix FactorizationAurélien Bellet, Edwige Cyffers, Davide Frey, Romaric Gaudel et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- The Privacy Power of Correlated Noise in Decentralized LearningYoussef Allouah, Anastasia Koloskova, Aymane El Firdoussi, Martin Jaggi et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
- On the (In)security of Peer-to-Peer Decentralized Machine LearningDario Pasquini, Mathilde Raynal, Carmela TroncosoS&P 2023
