Spatial Frequency Bias in Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks
Mahyar Khayatkhoei, Ahmed Elgammal
Abstract
As the success of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) on natural images quickly propels them into various real-life applications across different domains, it becomes more and more important to clearly understand their limitations. Specifically, understanding GANs' capability across the full spectrum of spatial frequencies, i.e. beyond the low-frequency dominant spectrum of natural images, is critical for assessing the reliability of GAN generated data in any detail-sensitive application (e.g. denoising, filling and super-resolution in medical and satellite images). In this paper, we show that the ability of convolutional GANs to learn a distribution is significantly affected by the spatial frequency of the underlying carrier signal, that is, GANs have a bias against learning high spatial frequencies. Crucially, we show that this bias is not merely a result of the scarcity of high frequencies in natural images, rather, it is a systemic bias hindering the learning of high frequencies regardless of their prominence in a dataset. Furthermore, we explain why large-scale GANs' ability to generate fine details on natural images does not exclude them from the adverse effects of this bias. Finally, we propose a method for manipulating this bias with minimal computational overhead. This method can be used to explicitly direct computational resources towards any specific spatial frequency of interest in a dataset, extending the flexibility of GANs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated ImagesTarik Dzanic, Karan Shah, Freddie D. WitherdenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- On the Frequency Bias of Generative ModelsKatja Schwarz, Yiyi Liao, Andreas GeigerNeurIPS 2021 · 117 citations
- ADD: Frequency Attention and Multi-View Based Knowledge Distillation to Detect Low-Quality Compressed Deepfake ImagesLe Minh Binh, Simon S. WooAAAI 2022 · 114 citations
- FreeU: Free Lunch in Diffusion U-NetChenyang Si, Ziqi Huang, Yuming Jiang, Ziwei LiuCVPR 2024 · 111 citations
- Quality-Agnostic Deepfake Detection with Intra-model Collaborative LearningBinh Minh Le, Simon S. WooICCV 2023 · 50 citations
Builds on3
- Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated ImagesTarik Dzanic, Karan Shah, Freddie D. WitherdenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Watch Your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks Are Failing to Reproduce Spectral DistributionsRicard Durall, Margret Keuper, Janis KeuperCVPR 2020
- Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANTero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image RecognitionJoel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Schönherr, Asja Fischer et al.ICML 2020 · 848 citations
- SWAGAN: a style-based wavelet-driven generative modelRinon Gal, Dana Cohen Hochberg, Amit Bermano, Daniel Cohen-OrSIGGRAPH 2021 · 96 citations
- F-Drop&Match: GANs with a Dead Zone in the High-Frequency DomainShin'ya Yamaguchi, Sekitoshi KanaiICCV 2021 · 6 citations
- FreGAN: Exploiting Frequency Components for Training GANs under Limited DataMengping Yang, Zhe Wang, Ziqiu Chi, Yanbing ZhangNeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
- Spectral Distribution Aware Image GenerationSteffen Jung, Margret KeuperAAAI 2021 · 42 citations
