Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognition
Joel Frank, Thorsten Eisenhofer, Lea Schönherr, Asja Fischer, Dorothea Kolossa, Thorsten Holz
Abstract
Deep neural networks can generate images that are astonishingly realistic, so much so that it is often hard for humans to distinguish them from actual photos. These achievements have been largely made possible by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). While deep fake images have been thoroughly investigated in the image domain - a classical approach from the area of image forensics - an analysis in the frequency domain has been missing so far. In this paper, we address this shortcoming and our results reveal that in frequency space, GAN-generated images exhibit severe artifacts that can be easily identified. We perform a comprehensive analysis, showing that these artifacts are consistent across different neural network architectures, data sets, and resolutions. In a further investigation, we demonstrate that these artifacts are caused by upsampling operations found in all current GAN architectures, indicating a structural and fundamental problem in the way images are generated via GANs. Based on this analysis, we demonstrate how the frequency representation can be used to identify deep fake images in an automated way, surpassing state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef0b1f8b-47d6-46bf-a0db-e8f009de91f4Cited by top-tier papers185
- DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image DetectionZhendong Wang, Jianmin Bao, Wengang Zhou, Weilun Wang et al.ICCV 2023 · 479 citations
- Focal Frequency Loss for Image Reconstruction and SynthesisLiming Jiang, Bo Dai, Wayne Wu, Chen Change LoyICCV 2021 · 422 citations
- The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion ModelsPierre Fernandez, Guillaume Couairon, Hervé Jégou, Matthijs Douze et al.ICCV 2023 · 370 citations
- Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended ImagesKaede Shiohara, Toshihiko YamasakiCVPR 2022 · 366 citations
- Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery DetectionYinglin Zheng, Jianmin Bao, Dong Chen, Ming Zeng et al.ICCV 2021 · 314 citations
Builds on3
- Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN FingerprintsNing Yu, Larry Davis, Mario FritzICCV 2019 · 533 citations
- CNN-Generated Images Are Surprisingly Easy to Spot... for NowSheng-Yu Wang, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Andrew Owens et al.CVPR 2020
- Watch Your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks Are Failing to Reproduce Spectral DistributionsRicard Durall, Margret Keuper, Janis KeuperCVPR 2020
Related papers
- Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated ImagesTarik Dzanic, Karan Shah, Freddie D. WitherdenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Frequency-Aware Deepfake Detection: Improving Generalizability through Frequency Space Domain LearningChuangchuang Tan, Yao Zhao, Shikui Wei, Guanghua Gu et al.AAAI 2024 · 232 citations
- On the Frequency Bias of Generative ModelsKatja Schwarz, Yiyi Liao, Andreas GeigerNeurIPS 2021 · 117 citations
- Spectral Distribution Aware Image GenerationSteffen Jung, Margret KeuperAAAI 2021 · 42 citations
- Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-Based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake DetectionChuangchuang Tan, Huan Liu, Yao Zhao, Shikui Wei et al.CVPR 2024 · 126 citations
