LLM-Generated Invariants for Bounded Model Checking Without Loop Unrolling
Muhammad A. A. Pirzada, Giles Reger, Ahmed Bhayat, Lucas C. Cordeiro
Abstract
We investigate a modification of the classical Bounded Model Checking (BMC) procedure that does not handle loops through unrolling but via modifications to the control flow graph (CFG). A portion of the CFG representing a loop is replaced by a node asserting invariants of the loop. We generate these invariants using Large Language Models (LLMs) and use a first-order theorem prover to ensure the correctness of the generated statements. We thus transform programs to loop-free variants in a sound manner. Our experimental results show that the resulting tool, ESBMC ibmc, is competitive with state-of-the-art formal verifiers for programs with unbounded loops, significantly improving the number of programs verified by the industrial-strength software verifier ESBMC and verifying programs that state-of-the-art software verifiers such as SeaHorn and VeriAbs could not.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e4f90285-563c-4846-9745-2d005df4dae9Cited by top-tier papers8
- Reflections on the Reproducibility of Commercial LLM Performance in Empirical Software Engineering StudiesFlorian Angermeir, Maximilian Amougou, Mark Kreitz, Andreas Bauer et al.ICSE 2026 · 1 citation
- SpecMAS: A Multi-Agent System for Self-Verifying System Generation via Formal Model CheckingRishabh Agrawal, Kaushik T. Ranade, Aja Khanal, Kalyan S. Basu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Tale of 1001 LoC: Potential Runtime Error-Guided Specification Synthesis for Verifying Large-Scale ProgramsZhongyi Wang, Tengjie Lin, Mingshuai Chen, Haokun Li et al.OOPSLA 2026 · 1 citation
- Array-Carrying Symbolic Execution for Function Contract GenerationWeijie Lu, Jingyu Ke, Hongfei Fu, Zhouyue Sun et al.FM 2026
- Can LLM Aid in Solving Constraints with Inductive Definitions?Weizhi Feng, Shidong Shen, Jiaxiang Liu, Taolue Chen et al.FM 2026
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Autoformalization with Large Language ModelsYuhuai Wu, Albert Qiaochu Jiang, Wenda Li, Markus N. Rabe et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 364 citations
- Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language ModelsZhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Alex SmolaICLR 2023 · 234 citations
- Can Large Language Models Reason about Program Invariants?Kexin Pei, David Bieber, Kensen Shi, Charles Sutton et al.ICML 2023 · 128 citations
Related papers
- LLM Meets Bounded Model Checking: Neuro-symbolic Loop Invariant InferenceGuangyuan Wu, Weining Cao, Yuan Yao, Hengfeng Wei et al.ASE 2024 · 9 citations
- Not All Invariants Are Equal: Curating Training Data to Accelerate Program Verification with SLMsIdo Pinto, Yizhak Elboher, Haoze Wu, Nina Narodytska et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- LLM-Guided Loop Bound Generation for Program Termination VerificationZan Gong, Biting Huang, Fei HeICML 2026
- Enchanting Program Specification Synthesis by Large Language Models Using Static Analysis and Program VerificationCheng Wen, Jialun Cao, Jie Su, Zhiwu Xu et al.CAV 2024 · 60 citations
- Verification-Preserving Inlining in Automatic Separation Logic VerifiersThibault Dardinier, Gaurav Parthasarathy, Peter MüllerOOPSLA 2023 · 5 citations
