DiscoverLLM: From Executing Intents to Discovering Them
Tae Soo Kim, Yoonjoo Lee, Jaesang Yu, John Chung, Juho Kim
Abstract
To handle ambiguous and open-ended requests, Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly trained to interact with users to surface intents they have not yet expressed (e.g., ask clarification questions). However, users are often ambiguous because they have not yet formed their intents: they must observe and explore outcomes to discover what they want. Simply asking "what kind of tone do you want?" fails when users themselves do not know. We introduce DiscoverLLM, a novel and generalizable framework that trains LLMs to help users form and discover their intents. Central to our approach is a novel user simulator that models cognitive state with a hierarchy of intents that progressively concretize as the model surfaces relevant options---where the degree of concretization serves as a reward signal that models can be trained to optimize. Resulting models learn to collaborate with users by adaptively diverging (i.e., explore options) when intents are unclear, and converging (i.e., refine and implement) when intents concretize. Across proposed interactive benchmarks in creative writing, technical writing, and SVG drawing, DiscoverLLM achieves over 10% higher task performance while reducing conversation length by up to 40%. In a user study with 75 human participants, DiscoverLLM improved conversation satisfaction and efficiency compared to baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e47b3c87-ea74-4aa2-914c-e8a3dee7b1c1Builds on24
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn ConversationPhilippe Laban, Hiroaki Hayashi, Yingbo Zhou, Jennifer NevilleICLR 2026 · 491 citations
Related papers
- Modeling Future Conversation Turns to Teach LLMs to Ask Clarifying QuestionsMichael J. Q. Zhang, W. Bradley Knox, Eunsol ChoiICLR 2025
- IntentRL: Training Proactive User-intent Agents for Open-ended Deep Research via Reinforcement LearningHaohao Luo, Zexi Li, Yuexiang Xie, Wenhao Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Measuring Intent Comprehension in LLMsNadav Kunievsky, James EvansICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Prism: Towards Lowering User Cognitive Load in LLMs via Complex Intent UnderstandingZenghua Liao, Jinzhi Liao, Xiang ZhaoWWW 2026
- Uncertainty-Aware Clarification in LLM Agents with Information GainMengyi DENG, Zhiwei Li, Xin Li, Tingyu ZHU et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
