Prism: Towards Lowering User Cognitive Load in LLMs via Complex Intent Understanding
Zenghua Liao, Jinzhi Liao, Xiang Zhao
Abstract
Large Language Models are rapidly emerging as web-native interfaces to social platforms. On the social web, users frequently have ambiguous and dynamic goals, making complex intent understanding-rather than single-turn execution-the cornerstone of effective human-LLM collaboration. Existing approaches attempt to clarify user intents through sequential or parallel questioning, yet they fall short of addressing the core challenge: modeling the logical dependencies among clarification questions. Inspired by the Cognitive Load Theory, we propose Prism, a novel framework for complex intent understanding that enables logically coherent and efficient intent clarification. Prism comprises four tailored modules: a complex intent decomposition module, which decomposes user intents into smaller, well-structured elements and identifies logical dependencies among them; a logical clarification generation module, which organizes clarification questions based on these dependencies to ensure coherent, low-friction interactions; an intent-aware reward module, which evaluates the quality of clarification trajectories via an intent-aware reward function and leverages Monte Carlo Sample to simulate user-LLM interactions for large-scale, high-quality training data generation; and a self-evolved intent tuning module, which iteratively refines the LLM's logical clarification capability through data-driven feedback and optimization. Prism consistently outperforms existing approaches across clarification interactions, intent execution, and cognitive load benchmarks. It achieves stateof-the-art logical consistency, reduces logical conflicts to 11.5%, increases user satisfaction by 14.4%, and decreases task completion time by 34.8%. All data and code are released 1 . CCS Concepts • Information systems → Query intent.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 90796ab5-d9b6-4672-878b-7611813f1cd2Builds on7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Towards Scalable Multi-Domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue DatasetAbhinav Rastogi, Xiaoxue Zang, Srinivas Sunkara, Raghav Gupta et al.AAAI 2020 · 707 citations
- ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree SearchDan Zhang, Sining Zhoubian, Ziniu Hu, Yisong Yue et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 527 citations
- Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model TrainingJiale Cheng, Xiao Liu, Kehan Zheng, Pei Ke et al.ACL 2024 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Uncertainty-Aware Clarification in LLM Agents with Information GainMengyi DENG, Zhiwei Li, Xin Li, Tingyu ZHU et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- DiscoverLLM: From Executing Intents to Discovering ThemTae Soo Kim, Yoonjoo Lee, Jaesang Yu, John Chung et al.ICML 2026
- Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMsYuxuan Qiao, Haodong Duan, Xinyu Fang, Junming Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- From Navigation to Intention: Reframing the Web Experience through Goal-Driven InterfacesLuca Cordioli, Maristella MateraWWW 2026
- Measuring Intent Comprehension in LLMsNadav Kunievsky, James EvansICML 2026 · 1 citation
