Context-Aware Hierarchical Learning: A Two-Step Paradigm towards Safer LLMs
Tengyun Ma, Jiaqi Yao, Daojing He, Shihao Peng, Yu Li, Shaohui Liu, Zhuotao Tian
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for diverse applications. However, their uniform token processing paradigm introduces critical vulnerabilities in instruction handling, particularly when exposed to adversarial scenarios. In this work, we identify and propose a novel class of vulnerabilities, termed Tool-Completion Attack (TCA), which exploits function-calling mechanisms to subvert model behavior. To evaluate LLM robustness against such threats, we introduce the Tool-Completion benchmark, a comprehensive security assessment framework, which reveals that even state-of-the-art models remain susceptible to TCA, with surprisingly high attack success rates. To address these vulnerabilities, we introduce Context-Aware Hierarchical Learning (CAHL), a sophisticated mechanism that dynamically balances semantic comprehension with role-specific instruction constraints. CAHL leverages the contextual correlations between different instruction segments to establish a robust, context-aware instruction hierarchy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAHL significantly enhances LLM robustness against both conventional attacks and the proposed TCA, exhibiting strong generalization capabilities in zero-shot evaluations while still preserving model performance on generic tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/S2AILab/CAHL.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e4767afb-0fdf-4477-b790-3f6fb7e3e576Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt InjectionZekun Li, Baolin Peng, Pengcheng He, Xifeng YanEMNLP 2024 · 15 citations
- Instructional Segment Embedding: Improving LLM Safety with Instruction HierarchyTong Wu, Shujian Zhang, Kaiqiang Song, Silei Xu et al.ICLR 2025
- Evaluating Robustness of Large Audio Language Models to Audio Injection: An Empirical StudyGuanyu Hou, Jiaming He, Yinhang Zhou, Ji Guo et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
- Attractive Metadata Attack: Inducing LLM Agents to Invoke Malicious ToolsKanghua Mo, Li Hu, Yucheng Long, Zhihao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 37 citations
- MCP Security Bench (MSB): Benchmarking Attacks Against Model Context Protocol in LLM AgentsDongsen Zhang, Zekun Li, Xu Luo, Xuannan Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
