Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

SafeToolBench: Pioneering a Prospective Benchmark to Evaluating Tool Utilization Safety in LLMs

Hongfei Xia, Hongru Wang, Zeming Liu, Qian Yu, Yuhang Guo, Haifeng Wang

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited great performance in autonomously calling various tools in external environments, leading to better problem solving and task automation capabilities. However, these external tools also amplify potential risks such as financial loss or privacy leakage with ambiguous or malicious user instructions. Compared to previous studies, which mainly assess the safety awareness of LLMs after obtaining the tool execution results (i.e., retrospective evaluation), this paper focuses on prospective ways to assess the safety of LLM tool utilization, aiming to avoid irreversible harm caused by directly executing tools. To this end, we propose SafeToolBench, the first benchmark to comprehensively assess tool utilization security in a prospective manner, covering malicious user instructions and diverse practical toolsets. Additionally, we propose a novel framework, SafeInstructTool, which aims to enhance LLMs' awareness of tool utilization security from three perspectives (i.e., User Instruction, Tool Itself, and Joint Instruction-Tool), leading to nine detailed dimensions in total. We experiment with four LLMs using different methods, revealing that existing approaches fail to capture all risks in tool utilization. In contrast, our framework significantly enhances LLMs' self-awareness, enabling a more safe and trustworthy tool utilization. Our code and data are publicly available at https: //github.com/BITHLP/SafeToolBench.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers2

  1. Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool InvocationsYilong Liu, Xixun Lin, Pengfei Cao, Ge Zhang et al.ACL 2026
  2. OrchestrationBench: LLM-Driven Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Multi-Domain ScenariosAelim Ahn, Sooyeon Lee, Hyosun Wang, Chiwan Park et al.ICLR 2026

Builds on13

  1. Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIsShishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, Joseph E. GonzalezNeurIPS 2024 · 1,715 citations
  2. Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated SandboxYangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis et al.ICLR 2024 · 292 citations
  3. Watch Out for Your Agents! Investigating Backdoor Threats to LLM-Based AgentsWenkai Yang, Xiaohan Bi, Yankai Lin, Sishuo Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 195 citations
  4. InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model AgentsQiusi Zhan, Zhixiang Liang, Zifan Ying, Daniel KangACL Findings 2024 · 147 citations
  5. API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMsMinghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song et al.EMNLP 2023 · 72 citations

Related papers

  1. Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language ModelsYeonjun In, Wonjoong Kim, Kanghoon Yoon, Sungchul Kim et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
  2. PropensityBench: Evaluating Latent Safety Risks in Large Language Models via an Agentic ApproachUdari Madhushani Sehwag, Shayan Shabihi, Alex McAvoy, Vikash Sehwag et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
  3. SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
  4. ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool UsageChen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
  5. Reducing Tool Hallucination via Reliability AlignmentHongshen Xu, Zichen Zhu, Lei Pan, Zihan Wang et al.ICML 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines