EMNLP Findings2023
Distilling ChatGPT for Explainable Automated Student Answer Assessment
Jiazheng Li, Lin Gui, Yuxiang Zhou, David West, Cesare Aloisi, Yulan He
Abstract
Providing explainable and faithful feedback is crucial for automated student answer assessment. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that explores using ChatGPT, a cuttingedge large language model, for the concurrent tasks of student answer scoring and rationale generation. We identify the appropriate instructions by prompting ChatGPT with different templates to collect the rationales, where inconsistent rationales are refined to align with marking standards. The refined ChatGPT outputs enable us to fine-tune a smaller language model that simultaneously assesses student answers and provides rationales. Extensive experiments on the benchmark dataset show that the proposed method improves the overall QWK score by 11% compared to ChatGPT. Furthermore, our thorough analysis and human evaluation demonstrate that the rationales generated by our proposed method are comparable to those of ChatGPT. Our approach provides a viable solution to achieve explainable automated assessment in education 1 .
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 6 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- ExDDI: Explaining Drug-Drug Interaction Predictions with Natural LanguageZhaoyue Sun, Jiazheng Li, Gabriele Pergola, Yulan HeAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Fact : Teaching MLLMs with Faithful, Concise and Transferable RationalesMinghe Gao, Shuang Chen, Liang Pang, Yuan Yao et al.ACM MM 2024 · 2 citations
- CEAES: Bidirectional Reinforcement Learning Optimization for Consistent and Explainable Essay AssessmentXia Li, Wenjing PanACL 2025 · 1 citation
- A Multi-persona Framework for Argument Quality AssessmentBojun Jin, Jianzhu Bao, Yufang Hou, Yang Sun et al.ACL 2025
- MOGIC: Metadata-infused Oracle Guidance for Improved Extreme ClassificationSuchith Chidananda Prabhu, Bhavyajeet Singh, Anshul Mittal, Siddarth Asokan et al.ICML 2025
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step ReasoningYao Fu, Hao Peng, Litu Ou, Ashish Sabharwal et al.ICML 2023 · 347 citations
- Large Language Models Are Reasoning TeachersNamgyu Ho, Laura Schmid, Se-Young YunACL 2023 · 102 citations
- Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language GenerationLorenz Kuhn, Yarin Gal, Sebastian FarquharICLR 2023 · 49 citations
Related papers
- Calibrating LLMs with Preference Optimization on Thought Trees for Generating Rationale in Science Question ScoringJiazheng Li, Hainiu Xu, Zhaoyue Sun, Yuxiang Zhou et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 1 citation
- From Scoring to Explanations: Evaluating SHAP and LLM Rationales for Rubric-based Teaching Quality AssessmentIvo Bueno, Babette Bühler, Philipp Stark, Tim Fütterer et al.ACL Findings 2026
- T-SciQ: Teaching Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Large Language Model Signals for Science Question AnsweringLei Wang, Yi Hu, Jiabang He, Xing Xu et al.AAAI 2024 · 95 citations
- SCOTT: Self-Consistent Chain-of-Thought DistillationPeifeng Wang, Zhengyang Wang, Zheng Li, Yifan Gao et al.ACL 2023 · 39 citations
- Learning from Scoring Disagreements: Contrastive Error Mining for Efficient and Robust LLM-based AssessmentLei Chen, Tengteng Cheng, Boyu Gao, Zitao Liu et al.AAAI 2026
