Scalable DP-SGD: Shuffling vs. Poisson Subsampling
Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang
Abstract
We provide new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of the multi-epoch Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism with shuffled batch sampling, demonstrating substantial gaps when compared to Poisson subsampling; prior analysis was limited to a single epoch. Since the privacy analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is obtained by analyzing the ABLQ mechanism, this brings into serious question the common practice of implementing shuffling-based DP-SGD, but reporting privacy parameters as if Poisson subsampling was used. To understand the impact of this gap on the utility of trained machine learning models, we introduce a practical approach to implement Poisson subsampling at scale using massively parallel computation, and efficiently train models with the same. We compare the utility of models trained with Poisson-subsampling-based DP-SGD, and the optimistic estimates of utility when using shuffling, via our new lower bounds on the privacy guarantee of ABLQ with shuffling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e3bd173c-6781-4dce-8b92-da15116535d5Cited by top-tier papers9
- Privacy amplification by random allocationMoshe Shenfeld, Vitaly FeldmanNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- To Shuffle or not to Shuffle: Auditing DP-SGD with ShufflingMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Borja Balle, Jamie Hayes, Emiliano De CristofaroNDSS 2026 · 11 citations
- Efficient privacy loss accounting for subsampling and random allocationVitaly Feldman, Moshe ShenfeldICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy–Utility Guarantees for DP-SGDMurat Bilgehan Ertan), Marten van Dijk)CCS 2026 · 3 citations
- Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential PrivacyRob Romijnders, Antti KoskelaNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on11
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
- Numerical Composition of Differential PrivacySivakanth Gopi, Yin Tat Lee, Lukas WutschitzNeurIPS 2021 · 259 citations
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially Private GeneratorsDingfan Chen, Tribhuvanesh Orekondy, Mario FritzNeurIPS 2020 · 228 citations
Related papers
- How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar et al.ICML 2024 · 25 citations
- Rethinking the Security of DP-SGD: A Corrected Analysis of Differentially Private Machine LearningWenhao Wang, Shujie Cui, Hui Cui, Xingliang YuanCCS 2026
- Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix MechanismsChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Saminul Haque, Thomas Steinke et al.ICLR 2025
- Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent with Fixed-Size Minibatches: Tighter RDP Guarantees with or without ReplacementJeremiah Birrell, Reza Ebrahimi, Rouzbeh Behnia, Jason PachecoNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 354 citations
